Bug#900067: Toolbar icons fail to appear in jupyter notebook.

Package: jupyter-notebook Version: 5.4.1-1 Attached is a screen-captured image of the problem that I see. Also attached is the output from the 'jupyter notebook' command to the terminal. I expected to see icons on the toolbar under the menu, but instead I saw only a rectangle where each icon

Bug#887122: gnome-user-share

Debugging the obamenu python script, I found that it freaks out when it tries to read 'gnome-user-share.desktop'. When I uninstalled the 'gnome-user-share' package, the problem went away. -- Thomas E. Vaughan

Bug#887593: More apparmor="ALLOWED" messages in syslog.

I see that this bug is closed, but I see something similar in my system log. I am running Debian unstable updated as of yesterday. It seems that libreoffice is trying to make use of OpenCL, and I have a couple of OpenCL ICDs installed. After opening a PDF file in LibreOffice Draw, I saw the

Bug#887122: I see this same problem on my up-to-date Debian sid system.

I see this same problem on my up-to-date Debian sid system. -- Thomas E. Vaughan

Bug#883989: libreoffice-draw does not allow editing glue points

; tag 883989 upstream > tag 883989 fixed-upstream > forwarded 883989 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_ > bug.cgi?id=113594 > thanks > > Hi, > > On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 10:38:59PM -0700, Thomas Vaughan wrote: > > For the last few months, I have been unable t

Bug#883989: libreoffice-draw does not allow editing glue points

Package: libreoffice-draw Version: 1:6.0.0~beta1-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, For the last few months, I have been unable to add visible glue points or to edit existing glue points in an old drawing. This problem has persisted since I upgraded from stable to unstable. I recently tried

Bug#860119: gtk-window-decorator fails to run

.fr> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:02:58AM -0600, Thomas Vaughan wrote: > >I don't know the the problem reported at your link is exactly the same > >problem, but it looks related. > > > >In any event, my small patch to > >/usr/share/glib-2.0/sche

Bug#860119: gtk-window-decorator fails to run

for the stretch backports repository? On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Alex ARNAUD <alexarn...@hypra.fr> wrote: > Hello Thomas, > Thank you for using Compiz and pointing us bug. > > Le 11/04/2017 à 18:17, Thomas Vaughan a écrit : > >> Package: compiz-gnome >> Versi

Bug#860119: gtk-window-decorator fails to run

Package: compiz-gnome Version: 1:0.9.13.0+16.10.20160818.2-5 ​When trying to run gtk-window-decorator, I saw this: ​(gtk-window-decorator:28962): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: Settings schema 'org.gnome.metacity' does not contain a key named 'theme' Trace/breakpoint trap I have both gnome-flashback

Bug#853100: linux-image-4.9.0-1-amd64: Blocked tasks and no X on Latitude E6530

t;b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 20:17 -0700, Thomas Vaughan wrote: > > I have attached the output both for linux-3.16 (which seems to have no > > problem) and for linux-4.9. > > OK, so you have the VirtalBox and Broadcom wl modules loaded. I dou

Bug#853100: linux-image-4.9.0-1-amd64: Blocked tasks and no X on Latitude E6530

I suppose that the vbox* modules built by way of dkms count as out-of-tree. On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Thomas Vaughan <tevaug...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have attached the output both for linux-3.16 (which seems to have no > problem) and for linux-4.9. > > On Thu, Feb 16, 20

Bug#853100: linux-image-4.9.0-1-amd64: Blocked tasks and no X on Latitude E6530

I have attached the output both for linux-3.16 (which seems to have no problem) and for linux-4.9. On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 02:26 +0000, Thomas Vaughan wrote: > > No, I'm using only the free-s

Bug#853100: linux-image-4.9.0-1-amd64: Blocked tasks and no X on Latitude E6530

. There was no problem with Linux-4.8; bummer when Linux-4.8 disappeared from the Debian repositories. What counts as out-of-tree? On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 20:08 Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:37:16 -0700 Thomas Vaughan <tevaug...@

Bug#853100: Classification of Bug

When I submitted this bug report, I classified it as "normal". But I suspect that it is graver than that. My system is currently unusable with the kernel in testing and the kernel in unstable. Only by pulling the ancient kernel from stable can I use my system at all. -- Thomas E. Vaughan

Bug#853192: xfce4-panel: Aspect ratio of workspace switcher is wrong under Compiz.

Package: xfce4-panel Version: 4.12.1-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Now that Compiz is back in unstable, I am using it again. I prefer to use Compiz with XFCE. However, under Compiz the workspace switcher has the wrong aspect ratio for each workspace. Apparently, this is a bug reported

Bug#853100: linux-image-4.9.0-1-amd64: Blocked tasks and no X on Latitude E6530

Package: src:linux Version: 4.9.2-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Ever since linux-image-4.9.0-amd64 showed up in unstable, I've been unable to use it on my laptop, a Dell Latitude E6530. After boot, the display manager never shows the X login screen. Eventually, I see messages like the

Bug#849104: compizconfig-settings-manager should depend on libprotoc9v5

I figured out what my problem is. I had built compiz some months ago from source and installed it under /usr/local. There was still some python stuff under there, and the new ccsm python script was importing the compizconfig module from under /usr/local, which is apparently in the python path

Bug#849104: compizconfig-settings-manager should depend on libprotoc9v5

After uninstalling libprotoc9v5, I ran 'ccsm' from the command line and got this: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/ccsm", line 93, in import compizconfig ImportError: libprotobuf.so.9: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory $ dpkg -l '*compiz*' | grep

Bug#849097: compizconfig-settings-manager should depend on libprotoc9v5

Package: compizconfig-settings-manager Version: 1:0.9.13.0+16.10.20160 Because libprotoc9v5 is not selected by apt on installation of compizconfig-settings-manager, running the ccsm executable, which is linked against that library, fails. -- Thomas E. Vaughan

Bug#776171: same problem

On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 15:36:57 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > Hi > > Am 25.02.2016 um 10:26 schrieb Vincent Bernat: > > > > Same problem here. Any poweroff, reboot, suspend targets answer with the > > same message. Absolutely no clue how to debug

Bug#776171: I See This Problem on Dell Latitude E6530 Laptop When Docked

When my laptop is docked and the lid closed, I see this problem: It is impossible for me to shutdown (without holding the power button until power is suddenly withdrawn from the system). Running Debian sid with systemd-229-2. When docked, my machine uses the NVIDIA kernel driver built via dkms.

Bug#782077: Bug seems not fixed.

I am running a Dell E6530 with Debian unstable, lightdm (1.16.6-1) and systemd (228-6). If I don't keep the lid open when docked, then the system goes to sleep before I can log in. -- Thomas E. Vaughan

Bug#773057: I see same problem on Jessie.

Does anyone know what the problem is and/or have a work-around? -- Thomas E. Vaughan

Bug#788575: liquidprompt seems to have been removed from unstable.

Yes. Liquidprompt seems to be in Debian unstable again this morning. Thanks! On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez arturo.borrero.g...@gmail.com wrote: On 12 June 2015 at 22:41, Thomas Vaughan tevaug...@gmail.com wrote: Package: liquidprompt Version: 1.9-1 After

Bug#788575: liquidprompt seems to have been removed from unstable.

Package: liquidprompt Version: 1.9-1 After installing liquidprompt on its appearance in Debian unstable a day or two ago, I notice today that liquidprompt appears in the Obsolete and Locally Created Packages section in aptitude. I wrote to the maintainer, who asked me to open this bug report. I

Bug#741064: upstream fix

be in order. What am I missing? On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote: 16.11.2014 00:29, Thomas Vaughan wrote: On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:23:40 +0300 Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru mailto:m...@tls.msk.ru wrote: Sure, why not -- is `important' enough? I'd like

Bug#741064: upstream fix

On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:23:40 +0300 Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote: Sure, why not -- is `important' enough? I'd like to make it RC so autofs is removed from debian finally, as it is just too broken ​. If autofs might be removed from Debian, then I have a question. Is there a

Bug#763925: dolphin: Documentation about changing directory in terminal panel incorrect.

Package: dolphin Version: 4:4.14.1-1 Severity: minor Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, Dolphin's on-line documentation, displayed in KDE's help application, states that changing the directory in the Dolphin's Terminal Panel will not affect Dolphin's GUI view. This is incorrect. Changing the directory

Bug#761405: ruby2.1: Vector cross product in standard library is broken.

Package: ruby2.1 Version: 2.1.2-4 Severity: normal Tags: upstream In porting some three-dimensional-vector code from perl to ruby, I noticed that the Vector class in ruby-2.1's standard library is broken. It returns a vector that points in the opposite direction from that of the proper return

Bug#761405: ruby2.1: patch

Package: ruby2.1 Version: 2.1.2-4 Followup-For: Bug #761405 Here is a patch that fixes the problem. $ diff -u /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/matrix.rb matrix.rb --- /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/matrix.rb 2014-05-08 09:46:50.0 -0600 +++ matrix.rb 2014-09-13 10:38:50.0 -0600 @@ -1764,9

Bug#761405: ruby2.1: Vector cross product in standard library is broken.

Package: ruby2.1 Version: 2.1.2-4 Followup-For: Bug #761405 I answered a question about this over at StackOverflow. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23831320/why-ruby-cross-product-returns-different-value-from-cross-product-on-paper/ -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT

Bug#761405: ruby2.1: Vector cross product in standard library is broken.

Ok. I'll do that. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 13, 2014, at 11:30, Christian Hofstaedtler z...@debian.org wrote: Thank you for reporting this bug and the patch. Could you possibly report this in the upstream bug tracker, too? Best, Christian -- ,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler

Bug#721778: doxygen: Doxygen in unstable seems not to be compiled against libclang.

This seems to be a different link to the same discussion: http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/Doxygen-1-8-4-uses-libclang-to-improve-parsing-td4032204.html I can't speak to the question about failure to build from source, but Doxygen's call and called-by trees are unusable for my C++

Bug#727698: More Information

In an activity completely unrelated to IMAP or dovecot, I tried changing the password of an account on the same machine as my dovecot IMAP server. As root, I typed 'passwd foo' to change the password of the foo account. As soon as I pressed ENTER, the system printed, no talloc stackframe at

Bug#664706: libreoffice-report-builder: report-builder exception and rollback

Package: libreoffice-report-builder Version: 1:1.2.1+Lib03.4.6-2 Followup-For: Bug #664706 Dear Maintainer, I keep three machines up to date with unstable. The two that are amd64 architecture have no problem, but the one that is i686 architecture does show this problem. Unfortunately the i686

Bug#529732: An octave-quaternion package would be really nice!

Right now, I'm installing the quaternion package by hand because it seems not to be packaged for Debian. -- Thomas E. Vaughan

Bug#615598: I've seen something like this, too.

I've seen a similar problem, with the EDID complaint every so often, on a machine with Intel graphics, with each of 2.6.37-1 and 2.6.37-2. This machine's graphics continue to work. -- Thomas E. Vaughan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#608411: libgnome-desktop-2-17: Span style for desktop background doesn't zoom.

On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 16:59, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote: Le jeudi 30 décembre 2010 à 10:31 -0700, Thomas E. Vaughan a écrit : The problem is that, unless the image has *exactly* the right dimensions, there will be constant-color bars in the background on either side of the

Bug#567832: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck inside Virtualbox

with no problems. Jeff -Original Message- From: Thomas Vaughan [mailto:tevaug...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 8:45 PM To: Fleck, Jeff Subject: Fwd: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck inside Virtualbox Could you report on this. I filed a bug report

Bug#542701: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Very slow 2D performance on one screen of dual display until after switch to console VT and back.

On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org (03/09/2009): Thomas Vaughan wrote: By the way, I don't mind grabbing the relevant source and building for debug output, if that would be of any help.  I just need to know how

Bug#542701: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Very slow 2D performance on one screen of dual display until after switch to console VT and back.

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Carl Worthcwo...@cworth.org wrote: Hi Thomas, Hello, Carl, Thanks for taking the time to contact me. :^) You've got a very mysterious bug. Well, at least I have a reliable work-around. The acceleration code in the driver isn't aware of the two different

Bug#542701: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Very slow 2D performance on one screen of dual display until after switch to console VT and back.

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Brice Goglinbrice.gog...@ens-lyon.org wrote: Thomas E. Vaughan wrote: Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel Version: 2:2.8.0-2 By the way, the behavior is still the same with 2:2.8.1-1. When the X server first starts up, 2D performance (such as painting

Bug#542701: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Very slow 2D performance on one screen of dual display until after switch to console VT and back.

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Brice Goglinbrice.gog...@ens-lyon.org wrote: What happens if you swap monitors' positions? Does the slowness follow TMDS? No. That is, when I leave everything unchanged in 'xorg.conf' except for changing RightOf to LeftOf in the Monitor section for what was

Bug#542069: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Second screen (TMDS-1) not functioning after recent update to unstable.

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Brice Goglinbrice.gog...@ens-lyon.org wrote: Any idea if you had xserver-xorg-video-intel 2.7.1 before the upgrade? Well, it seems that I was using 2.7.1 at least as late as July 02, according to the date stamp on '/var/log/Xorg.1.log'. There is an EDID entry

Bug#542069: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Second screen (TMDS-1) not functioning after recent update to unstable.

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Thomas Vaughantevaug...@gmail.com wrote: Do you know of any other updates that might have messed up the EDID stuff for TMDS-1?  A kernel update? I discovered the problem. Please close this bug report 542069. The connector at the monitor attached to TMDS-1

Bug#542069: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Second screen (TMDS-1) not functioning after recent update to unstable.

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Carl Worthcwo...@cworth.org wrote: Beyond replicating the originally working software environment as well as possible, you can explore whether there's some other issue that could have affected things. For example, is it possible to switch cables from a

Bug#466908: still starts too early

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Jonny Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 08:57:33AM -0600, Thomas Vaughan wrote: odccm-0.11-3 still seems to start before hal. Anyway, there is a complaint about hal, and odccm doesn't start at boot time. I still have to start

Bug#466908: still starts too early

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Jonny Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your thoughts on the fix would also be appreciated. I'm no expert on this stuff, but your fix seems consistent with the documentation on the man page for 'update-rc.d'. Moreover, I tested your fix, and it seems to work. (I

Bug#466908: still starts too early

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Thomas Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your thoughts on the fix would also be appreciated. I'm no expert on this stuff, but your fix seems consistent with the documentation on the man page for 'update-rc.d'. When I look closely at the man page, I find

Bug#466908: still starts too early

odccm-0.11-3 still seems to start before hal. Anyway, there is a complaint about hal, and odccm doesn't start at boot time. I still have to start it manually. -- Thomas E. Vaughan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#473469: need to restart dbus before starting odccm in postinst

Even if '/etc/dbus-1/system.d/odccm.conf' is installed, starting odccm will not necessarily work. To be sure that dbus picks up the conf file, add /etc/init.d/dbus restart early in 'odccm.postinst', before it starts oddcm. -- Thomas E. Vaughan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL