s relevant to the question whether the bug was fixed
>> or not in the Debian kernel package.
> Not relevant. It was just to say that the tester's job has become much
> easier meanwhile.
>
--
William Bonnet
GPG : 7189 DC8E 15B9 B3E4 EA3E 902B 8EAC F0B9 25A5 9D48
http
Hi Bernhard,
I would like to ask you a simple question about your email please.
It is not about the M2 board itself, mostly about your checklist.
I would like to know please if you did it "by hand" or used a tool to do
the check ? Formatting output it self is not really difficult task,
Hi Christoph,
First of all i do apologize for my late answer, something went wrong on my side
with email delivery... :(
> do you have experience with Debian packaging? You'll likely have to
> work on packaging or updating Python module packages in Debian as well.
Yes I do, I have often made
Hi Christoph,
Dropping this package is a question that really makes sens. If the
decision is to keep it, and as a postgresql and pgadmin user i would
like to volunteer to takeover.
Il will certainly have many question,including about the takerover
procedure since it is the first time i apply
Hi
Is someone working on this package ?
I am using it and interested in packaging it. If someone is working on
it, please feel free to ask for some help.
Cheers
W.
--
William BONNET
CTO & Founder / The IT Makers
william.bon...@theitmakers.com
GSM +33 689 376 977
twitter @theitmakers
e another if it
happens again.
Kind regards,
--
William BONNET
CTO & Founder / The IT Makers
william.bon...@theitmakers.com
GSM +33 689 376 977
twitter @theitmakers
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
s Metzler <ametz...@bebt.de> wrote:
>> On 2016-04-18 William Bonnet <wbon...@theitmakers.com> wrote:
>>> Package: libgcrypt20
>>> Version: 1.6.5-2
>>> Severity: normal
>>> transifg is missing fom the build dependencies for this package
>>&
Package: libestr0
Version: 0.1.10-1
Severity: normal
Hi
I recently had some issues when rebuilding your libestr0 packages on
PPC64/sid.
The file aclocal.m4 has been included in the source archive, and
contains hardcoded version of aclocal. IIt seems to me that this file
should not have been
Package: libtasn1-6
Version: 4.7-3
Severity: normal
dblatex is missing fom the build dependencies for this package
I tried to build the libtasn1-6 inside a chroot created from buildd
targets (arch PPC64) with installing only fakeroot, devscripts and the
build-deps inside the chroot.
The package
Package: libgcrypt20
Version: 1.6.5-2
Severity: normal
transifg is missing fom the build dependencies for this package
I tried to build the libgcrypt20 inside a chroot created from buildd
targets (arch PPC64) with installing only fakeroot, devscripts and the
build-deps inside the chroot.
The
Hi Christoph,
Thanks for your answer. Is there some urgent things to do ? Any advice
about what I should start with ?
Maybe we can talk about this on IRC ? my Nick is _william_ on
irc.debian.org (also on freenode).
Cheers,
W.
--
William BONNET
CTO & Founder / The IT Makers
william
?
Kind Regards,
- --
William BONNET
CTO & Founder / The IT Makers
william.bon...@theitmakers.com
GSM +33 689 376 977
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWxd5BAAoJEI6s8LklpZ1IOBQH/A6gSkBcE2CTSbJfh5L9cGUx
+BSWWPiH5cttS9WPwCIUfdIYo9fP7b/XoL2oQRHWG5FHN/3pEEsHoCKZjm7Q
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Luis,
I am really interested in helping for this package. I am a PG user and
i use pgfouine or pgbadger from time to time.
Are you still looking for help ?
Kind regards,
- --
William BONNET
CTO & Founder / The IT Makers
william
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Christoph,
I am really interested in helping for this package. I am a PG user and
i use pgpool2 from time to time.
Are you still looking for help ?
Kind regards
- --
William BONNET
CTO & Founder / The IT Makers
william
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I am also interested in helping you to maintain these two packages. I
am looking for an opportunity to get involved in more technical stuff
within the community.
So maybe Gage and I could help you ?
Kind regards,
- --
William BONNET
CTO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I am really interested in helping for this package. I am an Apache
user and i use apachetop from time to time.
Are you still looking for help ?
Kind regards
- --
William BONNET
CTO & Founder / The IT Makers
william.bon...@theitmakers
with me either through the BT, or directly by
email or irc _william_. So we can define how to help
Thanks in advance
Kind regards,
- --
William BONNET
CTO & Founder / The IT Makers
william.bon...@theitmakers.com
GSM +33 689 376 977
twitter @theitmakers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I am really interested in helping for this package. Espcially since i
am a bootstrap user.
Are you still looking for help ?
Kind regards
- --
William BONNET
CTO & Founder / The IT Makers
william.bon...@theitmakers.com
GSM +33 689 376
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Mauro,
I am really interested in helping for this package. I am an Apache
user and i use wtop from time to time.
Are you still looking for help ?
Kind regards
- --
William BONNET
CTO & Founder / The IT Makers
william.bon...@theitmakers
Hi,
I would like to propose to help on this package. I am a pgadmin3 user
and have the skills to patch the upstream code if needed.
Please let me know if you are still looking for help
Kind regards
--
William BONNET
CTO & Founder / The IT Makers
william.bon...@theitmakers.com
GSM +33
in EVP_DecryptFinal_ex when padding is not good
+ (Closes #768681)
+
+ -- William Bonnet wllmb...@gmail.com Sun, 16 Nov 2014 13:46:13 +0100
+
openssl (1.0.1j-1) unstable; urgency=high
* New upstream release
diff -Nru openssl-1.0.1j/debian/patches/EVP_DecryptFinal_ex_missing_EVPerr_call.patch openssl
Hi Jérémy
I'm pretty amazed the problem comes from openssl.
So am i. But after analyzing the problem it really makes sense, let me
try to be more clear.
Did you check upstream openssl ? maybe it's a known bug,
so the Origin field could link to it, ideally.
I did checked upstream, and the
Hi Kurt
I think not returning which error occurred is actually intentional,
since you might
leak that information and turn it into a padding oracle.
But I'll check what the others thinks
Thanks for the feedback.
I have thought of the padding oracle attack, but since all others errors
have a
23 matches
Mail list logo