Package: gnome-core
Version: 1:43+1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: inasprec...@disroot.org
Dear Maintainer,
to this day, gnome-core still recommends network-manager-gnome.
While this may sound reasonable given the package names, the situation
is misleading: what network-manager-gnome offers
Package: emacs
Version: 1:28.2+1-15
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: inasprec...@disroot.org
Dear Maintainer,
The key for signing the GNU Emacs packages in the official GNU ELPA
archive has changed. The key included in this GNU Emacs version has
expired. This disables the download of the
Package: gnome-boxes
Version: 43.2-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: inasprec...@disroot.org
Dear Maintainer,
The problem is present on the gnome-boxes pacakge distributed in
the current Debian stable branch, Bullseye. When creating a new
virtual machine with the "+" button on the upper left
Package: dict-freedict-eng-jpn
Version: 2022.12.07-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: inasprec...@disroot.org
Dear Maintainer,
when uninstalling (purging) the package, I got the following error message:
Failed to stop dictd.service: Unit dictd.service not loaded.
invoke-rc.d: initscript dictd,
Hi,
I tried installing chromium-l10n again on a freshly updated
Bullseye machine (with the bullseye-security and bullseye-updates
repositories enabled, of course) and this time the operation
succeeded with no conflicts.
Unless there are new reports about this problem persisting, I
think this bug
49-2.
I think bug 1022806 is a recent one referring to 5.10.149-2
specifically, which is about this same issue. I don't think there
is a need to report yet another bug about it.
Best regards.
--
inasprecali
'm sorry, but your belief seems to be mistaken, since we have
multiple reports o 5.10.149-2 still not booting with the amdgpu
driver.
Best regards.
--
inasprecali
works for 5.10.0-18 and earlier.
I don’t know if this an entirely separate issue, however. I can
file a separate bug if you think it is appropriate.
Best regards.
--
inasprecali
Diederik de Haas writes:
> Then I'm inclined to think this *is* a separate issue, which is
> due to the upgrade to -19, but that you happen to have an AMD
> GPU is 'not' relevant.
> I realize it's not what you want, but may result in an useful
> extra data point if you (for this test) switch
On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 13:43:30 +0200 Diederik de Haas
wrote:
> Andreas and inasprecali,
>
> On zondag 23 oktober 2022 09:17:44 CEST Andreas Wirooks wrote:
> > Kernel parameters are:
> > radeon.si_support=0 radeon.cik_support=0 amdgpu.si_support=1
> > amdgpu.cik_supp
as possible.
Best regards
--
inasprecali
="radeon.si_support=0 amdgpu.si_support=1"
5.10.0-19 fails to boot, while 5.10.0-18 does.
Best regards.
--
inasprecali
I can confirm this same exact problem on a machine of mine.
CPU: AMD FX-8350
GPU: AMD R9 270X (Southern Islands Family)
5.10.0-19 fails to boot, while 5.10.0-18 does.
Best regards.
--
inasprecali
13 matches
Mail list logo
