Hi Nick,
On 21-12-2021 20:52, nick black wrote:
well, as i noted above, this use case certainly isn't the
standard way growlight will be used (although it's a valid one,
and one worth fixing -- this was a valuable exercise, and i
appreciate autopkgtests spotting this regression!). so it's not
well, as i noted above, this use case certainly isn't the
standard way growlight will be used (although it's a valid one,
and one worth fixing -- this was a valuable exercise, and i
appreciate autopkgtests spotting this regression!). so it's not
very important to users...but at the same time, it
Hi Nick,
On 21-12-2021 19:52, nick black wrote:
well, if you have an older version of notcurses, you're going to
run into this growlight problem, so "solving" this problem for
Debian would seem to me to require the versioned dep?
The problem exist only in unstable, and to have the problem,
if i don't need the versioned dep, there is -- so far as i can
tell -- no reason to upload a new growlight at all, unless i
need do so to retrigger the autopkgtests and allow a transition
to testing.
(sorry for my ignorance--i'm still applying for DD)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> I don't think you need the versioned depends really. Or did I miss
> something?
well, if you have an older version of notcurses, you're going to
run into this growlight problem, so "solving" this problem for
Debian would seem to me to require the versioned dep? i'm sure
you're much more
Hi Nick,
On 21-12-2021 14:53, nick black wrote:
the growlight bug: https://github.com/dankamongmen/growlight/issues/153
it was determined that this was a flaw in Notcurses when > input was redirected
from a file. it has been resolved,
So, I would reassign the bug to notcurses, mark it as
Control: reopen -1
oh no! =[ well, at least this can be my primary focus now that
notcurses iii is out. i believe i've already provided
https://github.com/dankamongmen/growlight/issues/153, but that's
the tracking issue upstream.
attempts to reproduce this locally have thus far been less than
Control: reopen -1
On 07-12-2021 02:10, nick black wrote:
in any case, things will be in much better shape when 1.2.38
hits unstable.
At least amd64 already failed with a time out.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
i went ahead and uploaded growlight 1.2.38 to experimental last
evening. it doesn't build now, of course, due to a dep on
missing libnotcurses3. i've asked my Application Manager (i'm
currently applying for DD status) to sponsor an upload of the
latter to experimental+NEW, so that i can begin the
Hi Nick
On 04-12-2021 21:29, nick black wrote:
Thanks. I actually just cut growlight 1.2.38 literally forty
minutes ago, and have prepared it for upload.
Great timing. :)
Unfortunately,
it's dependent on the new libnotcurses3, which needs to get
through NEW. I'm not yet a DD, so I'm hoping
Thanks. I actually just cut growlight 1.2.38 literally forty
minutes ago, and have prepared it for upload. Unfortunately,
it's dependent on the new libnotcurses3, which needs to get
through NEW. I'm not yet a DD, so I'm hoping my Application
Manager will be willing to sponsor an upload of
Source: growlight
Version: 1.2.35-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.2.37-2
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 997845
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
12 matches
Mail list logo
