Hi,
On 24/06/22 at 22:48 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:42 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >
> > Source: golang-github-templexxx-xor
> > Version: 0.1.2-5
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: FTBFS
> > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> > User: lu...@debian.org
> > Usertags:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:42 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> Source: golang-github-templexxx-xor
> Version: 0.1.2-5
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo reproducible
On 13/02/22 at 15:02 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On 17/01/22 at 00:56 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> > control: tags -1 +moreinfo unreproducible
> > control: severity -1 important
> >
> > Dear Lucas,
> >
> >
Hi Roger,
On 17/01/22 at 00:56 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> control: tags -1 +moreinfo unreproducible
> control: severity -1 important
>
> Dear Lucas,
>
> Thanks for the report!
>
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> > on amd64.
>
> However, I cannot
control: tags -1 +moreinfo unreproducible
control: severity -1 important
Dear Lucas,
Thanks for the report!
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
However, I cannot reproduce this ftbfs issue in my sid pbuilder environment.
The dh_auto_test can pass
Source: golang-github-templexxx-xor
Version: 0.1.2-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
6 matches
Mail list logo