On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 14:21:05 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2021, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i get that the server is misbehaving now so clients don't have much
> > choice but to workaround them, but the server response should be fixed
> > nevertheless.
>
> Happy to accept patches to
On Fri, 31 Dec 2021, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i get that the server is misbehaving now so clients don't have much
> choice but to workaround them, but the server response should be fixed
> nevertheless.
Happy to accept patches to fix the XML serialization in SOAP. The way
that Debbugs is doing it
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 21:41:04 +0100, Nis Martensen wrote:
> Debbugs already disables some of the possible types around here:
> https://salsa.debian.org/debbugs-team/debbugs/-/blob/master/cgi/soap.cgi#L49
> I suspect it should not disable the auto-detection completely because at
> least some of the
On 25 Dec 2021 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Dec 2021 01:26:00 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > I get that that bug report has a lot of spam, but debbugs prob shouldn't
> > ever return a with xsi:type other than xsd:long.
>
> err, obviously I meant should always have xsi:type of
On Sat, 25 Dec 2021 01:26:00 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> I get that that bug report has a lot of spam, but debbugs prob shouldn't
> ever return a with xsi:type other than xsd:long.
err, obviously I meant should always have xsi:type of *xsd:string*
Package: debbugs
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: vap...@gentoo.org
Running get_bug_log against this report returns bad response:
https://bugs.debian.org/557671
message #45 will yield:
4327390041297022
I get that that bug report has a lot of spam, but debbugs prob shouldn't
6 matches
Mail list logo
