Dear Tobias, Michael,
Can be please have an answer to the question below? Your lack of answer
is blocking migration to testing of multiple packages.
On 07-03-2022 17:28, dogs...@riseup.net wrote:
Paul Gevers писал 2022-03-06 21:36:
On 06-03-2022 11:30, dogs...@riseup.net wrote:
As I can
Hi,
Paul Gevers писал 2022-03-06 21:36:
> Hi Lev,
>
> On 06-03-2022 11:30, dogs...@riseup.net wrote:
>> As I can see, there is only one reverse build-dependency on swi-prolog
>> apart from eye and logol, that is ppl. It is a C++ library providing
>> SWI-Prolog interface. I tried to build it
Hi Lev,
On 06-03-2022 11:30, dogs...@riseup.net wrote:
As I can see, there is only one reverse build-dependency on swi-prolog
apart from eye and logol, that is ppl. It is a C++ library providing
SWI-Prolog interface. I tried to build it against swi-prolog from
unstable on amd64 porterbox and
Paul Gevers писал 2022-03-06 01:09:
> Hi Lev,
>
> On 04-03-2022 11:42, dogs...@riseup.net wrote:
>>> Do you confirm that this ABI change doesn't effect the other reverse
>>> build dependencies of src:swi-prolog? If that's the case I'm fine with
>>> removing the block. But I'm afraid (without
Hi Lev,
On 04-03-2022 11:42, dogs...@riseup.net wrote:
Do you confirm that this ABI change doesn't effect the other reverse
build dependencies of src:swi-prolog? If that's the case I'm fine with
removing the block. But I'm afraid (without checking from my side)
that the other package don't have
Paul Gevers писал 2022-03-04 00:46:
> Hi Lev,
>
> On 03-03-2022 08:46, dogs...@riseup.net wrote:
>> swi-prolog package (namely, swi-prolog-core) provides an easy way to
>> require some particular ABI since 8.2.0+dfsg-2 uploaded on Jun 9, 2020.
>> Specifically, in this case logol requires version
Le jeu. 3 mars 2022, 20:51, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> Hi Lev,
>
> On 03-03-2022 08:46, dogs...@riseup.net wrote:
> > swi-prolog package (namely, swi-prolog-core) provides an easy way to
> > require some particular ABI since 8.2.0+dfsg-2 uploaded on Jun 9, 2020.
> > Specifically, in this case logol
Hi Lev,
On 03-03-2022 08:46, dogs...@riseup.net wrote:
swi-prolog package (namely, swi-prolog-core) provides an easy way to
require some particular ABI since 8.2.0+dfsg-2 uploaded on Jun 9, 2020.
Specifically, in this case logol requires version 67 of binary ABI
(pre-compiled Prolog code),
Hi Paul,
Paul Gevers писал 2022-03-03 00:44:
> On 01-03-2022 12:01, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> This "fix" suggest there may be more breakage, normally the Release Team
>> would schedule binNMU's. Can you please elaborate how ABI is normally
>> maintained within swi-prolog, such that the rebuilds
Hi,
On 01-03-2022 12:01, Paul Gevers wrote:
This "fix" suggest there may be more breakage, normally the Release Team
would schedule binNMU's. Can you please elaborate how ABI is normally
maintained within swi-prolog, such that the rebuilds can be detected and
requested? I fail to see how in
Dear logol and swi-prolog maintainers,
On 01-03-2022 10:21, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Changes:
logol (1.7.9+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Source only upload, rebuilding against swi-prolog/8.4.2+dfsg-2 after
swi-prolog ABI break (Closes: #1006384).
This "fix"
11 matches
Mail list logo
