On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 03:03:34PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Sat 12 Mar 2022 at 03:01PM +01, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 01:00:44PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> >> Roland Clobus has put a lot of work & thoughts into reproducible images,
> >> so I've
> >> added him to cc:
Hello,
On Sat 12 Mar 2022 at 03:01PM +01, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 01:00:44PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> Roland Clobus has put a lot of work & thoughts into reproducible images, so
>> I've
>> added him to cc: now, so he can comment on this aspect of #1006912.
>
> Policy
On 12/03/2022 14:00, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 01:21:24PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
Or would it be enough for reproducible images if adduser would finally
implement #243929, making it possible to pre-determine UIDs before an
image is built?
for reproducible images it would
On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 01:00:44PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Roland Clobus has put a lot of work & thoughts into reproducible images, so
> I've
> added him to cc: now, so he can comment on this aspect of #1006912.
Policy editors, I think we can now choose between taking care of the
needs of
On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 01:21:24PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > unpredictable or non-deterministic allocation of such ids is a cause of non-
> > reproducibiliy for Debian images and installations, so us reproducible folks
> > would like to see "sensible" to be expanded to take reproducible builds
On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 11:58:31AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 08:15:37PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > This is my patch.
>
> I like your patch. :) I just have one comment:
>
> > +``Dynamic local`` allocated ids should by default be arranged in some
> > +sensible order,
Hi Marc,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 08:15:37PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> This is my patch.
I like your patch. :) I just have one comment:
> +``Dynamic local`` allocated ids should by default be arranged in some
> +sensible order, but the behavior should be configurable.
unpredictable or
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 05:01:00PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Please go ahead and write a patch. The Policy Editors are happy to
> review and edit proposed wording but we can't be responsible for
> producing all of the text that gets added to Policy.
This is my patch.
I took care to not
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 11:07:54PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Previous, still open, bug from 2004:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=228692
thanks for pointing this out. I have made some notes (both for adduser
and for policy) from that bug.
Adduser development has
Previous, still open, bug from 2004:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=228692
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello Marc,
On Tue 08 Mar 2022 at 07:40am +01, Marc Haber wrote:
> How about putting advice like this in policy:
>
> Suggestion 1:
> Create a dedicated chapter (which would ideally be placed between the
> current chapters 9.2.1. Introduction and 9.2.2. UID and GID classes)
> named "dynamically
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.6.0.1
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
Currently, Policy does contain guidelines about system accounts being
created on package installation. It is, however, more reluctant to give
advice about accout deletion on package uninstall and/or purge. In
Addition, the existing
12 matches
Mail list logo
