Bug#1007597: proposed MBF: packages still using source format 1.0

2022-03-15 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 15/03/22 at 09:29 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > > What the are the packages for which you are surprised that bugs were > > filed? I wonder which part of the criteria was too loose. > > It looks like the query didn't do quite what was intended, indeed: > src:userv-utils is maintained in git

Bug#1007597: proposed MBF: packages still using source format 1.0

2022-03-15 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Tue 15 Mar 2022 at 04:16pm +01, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 15/03/22 at 10:36 +, Ian Jackson wrote: >> Answers were given, including by a former DPL (whom you may observe >> is not someone I am on speaking terms with). >> >> But I see now that the MBF has gone ahead anyway. >> >> I