Bug#1010004: RFS: odr-dabmod/2.6.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401

2022-05-02 Thread Bastian Germann
Am 02.05.22 um 08:27 schrieb Robin ALEXANDER: Since the odr-dabmod package was not moved to the NEW queue yet, can I just reload the package with the updated debian/rules file or do I also need to modify file debian/changelog indicating the change on debian/rules? In the latter case, do I need

Bug#1010004: RFS: odr-dabmod/2.6.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401

2022-05-02 Thread Robin ALEXANDER
Hi Bastian, I just realized that I need to make a slight change to file debian/rules by calling dh_auto_configure with an additional argument in order to avoid compiling odr-dabmod with the option "-march=native". Since the odr-dabmod package was not moved to the NEW queue yet, can I just reload

Bug#1010004: RFS: odr-dabmod/2.6.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401

2022-04-29 Thread Bastian Germann
Am 29.04.22 um 11:07 schrieb Robin ALEXANDER: As I wrote to you, I: 1. Uploaded on Wednesday (April 27) the corrected versions of odr- dabmux (https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-dabmux/) and odr-dabmod (https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-dabmod/) 2. Removed the moreinfo tag on

Bug#1010004: RFS: odr-dabmod/2.6.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401

2022-04-29 Thread Robin ALEXANDER
Hi Bastian, Thank you for your answer: it is crystal clear! As I wrote to you, I: 1. Uploaded on Wednesday (April 27) the corrected versions of odr- dabmux (https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-dabmux/) and odr-dabmod (https://mentors.debian.net/package/odr-dabmod/) 2. Removed the

Bug#1010004: RFS: odr-dabmod/2.6.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401

2022-04-27 Thread Bastian Germann
Am 27.04.22 um 14:13 schrieb Robin ALEXANDER: I now have 1 question. When I built these packages, debuild generated the xxx_amd64.changes files. Why do I have "amd64" in the filename (I understand it relates to the X86_64 architecture)? For your information, the source is mainly C++ based and it

Bug#1010004: RFS: odr-dabmod/2.6.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401

2022-04-27 Thread Robin ALEXANDER
Hi Bastian, thank you very much. I followed your instructions and uploaded again both odr-dabmod (Bug#1010004) and odr-dabmux (Bug#1009867). I also removed the tag "moreinfo" on both bugs (hoping I did it right). I now have 1 question. When I built these packages, debuild generated the

Bug#1010004: RFS: odr-dabmod/2.6.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401

2022-04-26 Thread Bastian Germann
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:20:06 +0200 Robin ALEXANDER wrote: Changes for the initial release:  odr-dabmod (2.6.0-1) unstable; urgency=low  .    * Initial release. Closes: #1007104 Please fix the lintian error (JS minified, source missing) by having the unminified

Bug#1010004: RFS: odr-dabmod/2.6.0-1 [ITP] -- DAB modulator compliant to ETSI EN 300 401

2022-04-22 Thread Robin ALEXANDER
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "odr-dabmod":  * Package name    : odr-dabmod    Version : 2.6.0-1    Upstream Author : Matthias P. Braendli  * URL : https://www.opendigitalradio.org/mmbtools  *