Hi. I have made the upload.
But now I remember that this may get rejected for requiring
new binary packages (not sure if this has changed since the last
time), so wish me luck...
Thanks a lot for all the help!
On 2024-04-06 21:45 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> El 6/4/24 a las 20:53, Sven Joachim escribió:
>> 1. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#id11
>
> Ok, I had not read that part of Policy in a long time.
>
> One minor last thing:
>
> Assuming I make the changes and
El 6/4/24 a las 20:53, Sven Joachim escribió:
1. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#id11
Ok, I had not read that part of Policy in a long time.
One minor last thing:
Assuming I make the changes and package the new available
upstream version at the same time, can I
On 2024-04-06 19:49 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
>> Patch attached, I have tested that it builds on amd64 and i386. looked
>> at the generated Dependencies and verified that lintian does not go
>> crazy, but that's it. Note that I had to add libtool-bin rather than
>> just libtool to
Patch attached, I have tested that it builds on amd64 and i386. looked
at the generated Dependencies and verified that lintian does not go
crazy, but that's it. Note that I had to add libtool-bin rather than
just libtool to Build-Depends to prevent configure from complaining, and
also pacify
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 08:02:18PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2024-03-30 12:38 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > El 30/3/24 a las 9:43, Sven Joachim escribió:
> >> I think it would make sense for Debian to follow what Arch and Fedora
> >> are doing, introduce a libdialog15 package with the
On 2024-03-30 12:38 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> El 30/3/24 a las 9:43, Sven Joachim escribió:
>> I think it would make sense for Debian to follow what Arch and Fedora
>> are doing, introduce a libdialog15 package with the shared library and a
>> libdialog-dev package with the .so symlink but
El 30/3/24 a las 9:43, Sven Joachim escribió:
I think it would make sense for Debian to follow what Arch and Fedora
are doing, introduce a libdialog15 package with the shared library and a
libdialog-dev package with the .so symlink but without libdialog.a,
because that requires (if I understood
On 2023-01-05 20:32 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> - Original Message -
> | From: "Santiago Vila"
> | To: "Thomas Dickey" , 1012...@bugs.debian.org
> | Cc: "Sven Joachim"
> | Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2023 7:09:22 PM
> | Subject: Bug#101
- Original Message -
| From: "Santiago Vila"
| To: "Thomas Dickey" , 1012...@bugs.debian.org
| Cc: "Sven Joachim"
| Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2023 7:09:22 PM
| Subject: Bug#1012325: dialog: Multi-Arch: foreign package should not contain
static library
El 6/1/23 a las 0:39, Thomas Dickey escribió:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 04:05:29PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
In Debian the static library has always been named libdialog.a,
but the library according to the author is called libcdialog.so.
A development package could have both static and
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 04:05:29PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the patch.
>
> Yes, it would make sense to move *.h and .a to a libdialog-dev package.
>
> But I'm not sure about the best way to proceed after reading the reply from
> Thomas:
>
> > actually, a shared library is
Thanks a lot for the patch.
Yes, it would make sense to move *.h and .a to a libdialog-dev package.
But I'm not sure about the best way to proceed after reading the reply from
Thomas:
actually, a shared library is generally preferred for development packages.
This is what I build for my own
On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 11:19:20AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> On 2022-06-04 09:52 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> > Package: dialog
> > Version: 1.3-20211214-1
> > Severity: normal
> > User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> > Usertags: multiarch
> >
> > The
Control: tags -1 + patch
On 2022-06-04 09:52 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Package: dialog
> Version: 1.3-20211214-1
> Severity: normal
> User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: multiarch
>
> The dialog package is marked Multi-Arch: foreign, but contains the
> static library
Package: dialog
Version: 1.3-20211214-1
Severity: normal
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
The dialog package is marked Multi-Arch: foreign, but contains the
static library /usr/lib//libdialog.a. This is flagged as an
error by lintian.
,
| $
16 matches
Mail list logo
