Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violation (now with unnecessary soname bump libndr.so.2 => libndr.so.3)

2022-11-02 Thread Andreas Schneider
On Tuesday, 1 November 2022 11:21:55 CET Michael Tokarev via samba-technical wrote: > 01.11.2022 13:14, Ralph Boehme wrote: > > On 11/1/22 09:15, Michael Tokarev via samba-technical wrote: > >> Control: tag -1 + upstream > >> > >> Original context was at http://bugs.debian.org/1013259 , but

Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violation (now with unnecessary soname bump libndr.so.2 => libndr.so.3)

2022-11-02 Thread Andreas Schneider
On Tuesday, 1 November 2022 11:21:55 CET Michael Tokarev wrote: > 01.11.2022 13:14, Ralph Boehme wrote: > > On 11/1/22 09:15, Michael Tokarev via samba-technical wrote: > >> Control: tag -1 + upstream > >> > >> Original context was at http://bugs.debian.org/1013259 , but whole > >> thing *now*

Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violation (now with libndr.so.2 => libndr.so.3)

2022-11-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
Hmm. Other sssd packages are also affected by this. Not only sssd-ad but sssd-ipa and sssd-ad-common. Added the Breaks for these in Bullseye (and also in Ubuntu Jammy, which has exactly the same problem). Will be in the next upload. /mjt

Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violation (now with libndr.so.2 => libndr.so.3)

2022-11-01 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 10:59:11AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: And this revealed one more issue here, now with samba 4.17. Where, the same libndr.so again, has changed soname from libndr.so.2 to libndr.so.3! And it looks like *this* is what you're talking about now, once 4.17 with this new

Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violation (now with unnecessary soname bump libndr.so.2 => libndr.so.3)

2022-11-01 Thread Ralph Boehme
On 11/1/22 09:15, Michael Tokarev via samba-technical wrote: Control: tag -1 + upstream Original context was at http://bugs.debian.org/1013259 , but whole thing *now* has is about completely unnecessary soname bump of libndr in 4.17 due to debugging refinements. to me this looks like a

Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violation (now with unnecessary soname bump libndr.so.2 => libndr.so.3)

2022-11-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
01.11.2022 13:14, Ralph Boehme wrote: On 11/1/22 09:15, Michael Tokarev via samba-technical wrote: Control: tag -1 + upstream Original context was at http://bugs.debian.org/1013259 , but whole thing *now* has is about completely unnecessary soname bump of libndr in 4.17 due to debugging

Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violation (now with unnecessary soname bump libndr.so.2 => libndr.so.3)

2022-11-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: tag -1 + upstream Original context was at http://bugs.debian.org/1013259 , but whole thing *now* has is about completely unnecessary soname bump of libndr in 4.17 due to debugging refinements. 01.11.2022 11:07, Michael Tokarev wrote: 01.11.2022 10:59, Michael Tokarev wrote: .. And

Bug#1013259: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violation (now with libndr.so.2 => libndr.so.3)

2022-11-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
01.11.2022 10:59, Michael Tokarev wrote: .. And this revealed one more issue here, now with samba 4.17.  Where, the same libndr.so again, has changed soname from libndr.so.2 to libndr.so.3! And it looks like *this* is what you're talking about now, once 4.17 with this new libndr.so.3 hits

Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violation (now with libndr.so.2 => libndr.so.3)

2022-11-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
31.10.2022 19:14, Michael Stone wrote: If you can come up with a better solution than a strict dependency, great. But the current situation, in which samba upgrades randomly render systems unusable is, in my opinion, much much much worse than an overly strict dependency. Fundamentally the

Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violation

2022-10-31 Thread Michael Stone
If you can come up with a better solution than a strict dependency, great. But the current situation, in which samba upgrades randomly render systems unusable is, in my opinion, much much much worse than an overly strict dependency. Fundamentally the problem is that you're promising future

Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violation

2022-10-31 Thread Michael Tokarev
31.10.2022 18:15, Michael Stone wrote: The issue here is that packages built against samba-libs get a dependency on samba-libs >= version, and they really either need a dependency on samba-libs == version or the samba-libs package needs to be versioned (e.g., samba-libs2, samba-libs3, etc.) and

Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violation

2022-10-31 Thread Michael Stone
The issue here is that packages built against samba-libs get a dependency on samba-libs >= version, and they really either need a dependency on samba-libs == version or the samba-libs package needs to be versioned (e.g., samba-libs2, samba-libs3, etc.) and conflict with other versions, or

Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violation

2022-06-20 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Mon, 2022-06-20 at 10:39 +0200, Hannes Eberhardt wrote: > Package: samba-libs > Version: 2:4.16.1+dfsg-8~bpo11+1 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: hannes.eberha...@neumannmueller.com > > Dear Maintainer, > > I noticed that sssd service of a freeipa-client installation broke > with the

Bug#1013259: samba-libs: Possible policy violation

2022-06-20 Thread Hannes Eberhardt
Package: samba-libs Version: 2:4.16.1+dfsg-8~bpo11+1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: hannes.eberha...@neumannmueller.com Dear Maintainer, I noticed that sssd service of a freeipa-client installation broke with the following error message because of missing library. sssd[651553]: