Bug#1018915: v4l-utils: FTBFS with libbpf 1.0.0

2022-11-01 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 5:19 PM Sean Young wrote: > > Hi Sudip, > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 11:17:03PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > Can you please test the attached patch and confirm that it does not break > > any of the functionality. This is the only one now which is blocking me > > from

Bug#1018915: v4l-utils: FTBFS with libbpf 1.0.0

2022-11-01 Thread Sean Young
Hi Sudip, On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 11:17:03PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > Can you please test the attached patch and confirm that it does not break > any of the functionality. This is the only one now which is blocking me > from requesting libbbpf transition. Looks good, everything is working

Bug#1018915: v4l-utils: FTBFS with libbpf 1.0.0

2022-11-01 Thread Sean Young
Hi Sudip, Gregor, On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 11:29:29AM +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 10:44 AM Gregor Jasny wrote: > > One thing I miss in the patch is tightening the pkg-config rule to a > > minimum required version which provides LIBBPF_OPTS. Proper place would > > be

Bug#1018915: v4l-utils: FTBFS with libbpf 1.0.0

2022-10-31 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 10:44 AM Gregor Jasny wrote: > > Hi Sudip, > > thanks for working on the patch! > > On 10/30/22 10:43 AM, Sean Young wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 11:17:03PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > Sean, would you be able to port the existing code to libbpf 1.0? I >

Bug#1018915: v4l-utils: FTBFS with libbpf 1.0.0

2022-10-31 Thread Gregor Jasny
Hi Sudip, thanks for working on the patch! On 10/30/22 10:43 AM, Sean Young wrote: On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 11:17:03PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: Sean, would you be able to port the existing code to libbpf 1.0? I noticed that the current code already triggers deprecation warnings with

Bug#1018915: v4l-utils: FTBFS with libbpf 1.0.0

2022-10-30 Thread Sean Young
Hi Sudip, On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 11:17:03PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > Sean, would you be able to port the existing code to libbpf 1.0? I noticed > > > that the current code already triggers deprecation warnings with libbpf > > > 0.8.0. > > > > This needs porting, I'll add it to my

Bug#1018915: v4l-utils: FTBFS with libbpf 1.0.0

2022-10-29 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Control: tags -1 patch -- Hi Sean, Gregor, On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 05:29:57PM +0100, Sean Young wrote: > Hi Gregor, > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 02:53:49PM +0200, Gregor Jasny wrote: > > Hello Sudip, > > > > thanks for the report. > > > > On 02.09.22 01:19, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > >

Bug#1018915: v4l-utils: FTBFS with libbpf 1.0.0

2022-09-14 Thread Sean Young
Hi Gregor, On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 02:53:49PM +0200, Gregor Jasny wrote: > Hello Sudip, > > thanks for the report. > > On 02.09.22 01:19, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > Package: v4l-utils > > Version: 1.22.1-4 > > Severity: important > > Tags: ftbfs > > X-Debbugs-Cc: sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com > >

Bug#1018915: v4l-utils: FTBFS with libbpf 1.0.0

2022-09-01 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Package: v4l-utils Version: 1.22.1-4 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com Usertags: libbpf1 Dear Maintainer, v4l-utils FTBFS with libbpf 1.0.0 (available in experimental). This is the first error from the build log: bpf_load.c: In function 'load_and_attach':