Am 16.10.22 um 19:25 schrieb Niels Thykier:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2022 14:28:12 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote:
Given that dh-exec is basically unmaintained, I'm a bit reluctant to
switch to it.
The dh-exec package has a maintainer again. (I think this was mentioned
on IRC as well - repeating here
Hi Michael,
On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 02:28:12PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > the addition of cryptsetup plugins broke the stage1 build. Do you think
> > it would be possible to add a native stage1 build pass to salsa-ci such
> > that you'd notice earlier? Of course you'd only get the failure
On Sat, 15 Oct 2022 14:28:12 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 15.10.22 um 14:01 schrieb Helmut Grohne:
> Source: systemd
> Version: 251.6-1
> Severity: important
> Justification: breaks architecture bootstrap
> Tags: ftbfs patch
> User: helm...@debian.org
> Usertags: rebootstrap
>
> Hi,
>
> the
Am 15.10.22 um 14:01 schrieb Helmut Grohne:
the addition of cryptsetup plugins broke the stage1 build. Do you think
it would be possible to add a native stage1 build pass to salsa-ci such
that you'd notice earlier?
Good idea, how can we do that?
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP
Am 15.10.22 um 14:01 schrieb Helmut Grohne:
Source: systemd
Version: 251.6-1
Severity: important
Justification: breaks architecture bootstrap
Tags: ftbfs patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Hi,
the addition of cryptsetup plugins broke the stage1 build. Do you think
it would be
Source: systemd
Version: 251.6-1
Severity: important
Justification: breaks architecture bootstrap
Tags: ftbfs patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Hi,
the addition of cryptsetup plugins broke the stage1 build. Do you think
it would be possible to add a native stage1 build pass to
6 matches
Mail list logo
