Bug#1022779: dosbox: could dosbox-x be a future to dosbox?

2023-12-10 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Please Recommends: dosbox-x in the metadata & the free-text Description: Greetings

Bug#1022779: dosbox: could dosbox-x be a future to dosbox?

2022-10-27 Thread Stephen Kitt
I’ve heard of DOSBox Staging, but AFAICT all its features are in DOSBox-X. Someone else is working on packaging that, see https://bugs.debian.org/973822 Regards, Stephen On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 19:53:22 +0200, Patrice wrote: > So nice! > > Do you know this one

Bug#1022779: dosbox: could dosbox-x be a future to dosbox?

2022-10-26 Thread Patrice
So nice! Do you know this one https://github.com/dosbox-staging/dosbox-staging ? I found some packagings on Salsa like: https://salsa.debian.org/okias/dosbox-staging but it remained at the version 0.76.0 and now the upstream is 0.79.1. I haven't tried it yet. Best, Patrice On Wed, 26 Oct 2022

Bug#1022779: dosbox: could dosbox-x be a future to dosbox?

2022-10-26 Thread Stephen Kitt
Hi Patrice, Le 25/10/2022 19:55, Patrice Duroux a écrit : The dosbox-x project (https://dosbox-x.com/) is currently version 0.84.3 (2022.09.0) and seems to be SDL 2 compatible. Have you tried it? I have, and I’m actually working on packaging it. I’ve just filed an ITP to trace that fact,

Bug#1022779: dosbox: could dosbox-x be a future to dosbox?

2022-10-25 Thread Patrice Duroux
Package: dosbox Version: 0.74-3-4+b1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, The dosbox-x project (https://dosbox-x.com/) is currently version 0.84.3 (2022.09.0) and seems to be SDL 2 compatible. Have you tried it? Thanks, Patrice -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers