Control: retitle -1 RM: mricron [mipsel] -- ROM; Please remove some unsupported
architectures
Am Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 02:31:27PM -0500 schrieb Paul Tagliamonte:
> Can you retitle to match the arches you're intending to RM on?
Done.
Thanks for watching me
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 08:24:52PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> According to
>https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mricron
> the package builds on ppc64el and I left it in the architecture list.
> I had to remove ppc64 from the list of architectures since it did not
> built there.
>
Am Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 01:27:43PM -0500 schrieb Paul Tagliamonte:
> From the title: [mipsel powerpc ppc64]
>
> Is ppc64 right or should it be ppc64el? I suspect you mean/want ppc64el
> but I don't want to take an rm action here until I've got a lot of
> positive confirmation.
According to
Hey Andreas,
>From the title: [mipsel powerpc ppc64]
Is ppc64 right or should it be ppc64el? I suspect you mean/want ppc64el
but I don't want to take an rm action here until I've got a lot of
positive confirmation.
If that's right, would you please re-title this bug? Thank you very
much!
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: mric...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:mricron
Hi,
it turns out that mricron is not supported on some architectures.
I have uploaded a new package with a restricted set
5 matches
Mail list logo
