tobias.jakobi.compleo added more details in
https://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/3244
The issue appears to be lighttpd being built with 64-bit time_t, but the
underlying openssl library being built with 32-bit time_t *and* exposing
an API interface using time_t.
The result is that lighttpd might
Marco, please review my previous messages and try to help provide
additional information.
Thank you. Glenn
Macro, please review my previous messages and try to help provide
additional information.
Thank you. Glenn
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 02:35:05AM -0400, gs-debian@gluelogic.com wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 01:47:22PM -0400, gs-debian@gluelogic.com wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 06:14:25PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > On Apr 21, gs-debian@gluelogic.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > I
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 01:47:22PM -0400, gs-debian@gluelogic.com wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 06:14:25PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Apr 21, gs-debian@gluelogic.com wrote:
> >
> > > I probably should have started with the most basic thing:
> > >
> > > What is the date on your
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 06:14:25PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 21, gs-debian@gluelogic.com wrote:
>
> > I probably should have started with the most basic thing:
> >
> > What is the date on your device?
> NTP-accurate.
Perhaps there is something amiss in the Debian 32-bit build of
On Apr 21, gs-debian@gluelogic.com wrote:
> I probably should have started with the most basic thing:
>
> What is the date on your device?
NTP-accurate.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 09:38:31AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 21, gs-debian@gluelogic.com wrote:
>
> > What your `uname -a` ?
> Linux omitted.mi.bofh.it 6.1.0-7-arm64 #1 SMP Debian 6.1.20-2 (2023-04-08)
> aarch64 GNU/Linux
>
> > What is the output of the following for you?
> > $
On Apr 21, gs-debian@gluelogic.com wrote:
> What your `uname -a` ?
Linux omitted.mi.bofh.it 6.1.0-7-arm64 #1 SMP Debian 6.1.20-2 (2023-04-08)
aarch64 GNU/Linux
> What is the output of the following for you?
> $ lighttpd -V | grep "Y2038 support"
> + Y2038 support
Same.
Thank you for
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 07:41:13AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 21, gs-debian@gluelogic.com wrote:
>
> > Please confirm you are running an arm64 kernel, as you posted above.
> Confirmed.
What your `uname -a` ?
What is the output of the following for you?
$ lighttpd -V | grep "Y2038
On Apr 21, gs-debian@gluelogic.com wrote:
> Please confirm you are running an arm64 kernel, as you posted above.
Confirmed.
> What lighttpd package (from which architecture) do you have installed?
> $ file /usr/sbin/lighttpd
root@omitted:~# /usr/sbin/lighttpd -f /etc/lighttpd/lighttpd.conf
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 01:39:02AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Package: lighttpd
> Version: 1.4.69-1
> Severity: normal
>
> I am using the latest openssl and lighttpd packages on an armhf (with an
> arm64 kernel) and an amd64 system, and only on the armhf system I always
> get this warning at
Package: lighttpd
Version: 1.4.69-1
Severity: normal
I am using the latest openssl and lighttpd packages on an armhf (with an
arm64 kernel) and an amd64 system, and only on the armhf system I always
get this warning at startup even just after having created a Let's
Encrypt certificate.
Apr 19
13 matches
Mail list logo
