Hi Uwe,
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 09:17:48AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> The idea is to have several ignore-line-regexp specs, where each is simpler
> and can be documented individually. However that doesn't work as blhc only
> uses one of them (don't remember, probably the first or the last).
Control: retitle -1 support more than one ignore-line-regexp line
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Hello Simon,
On 5/3/23 18:50, Simon Ruderich wrote:
On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 12:21:02PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Do you have a nice idea how to fix the test that does involve neither
disabling
On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 12:21:02PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Do you have a nice idea how to fix the test that does involve neither
> disabling the blhc tests nor disabling the perf tests? One idea is to
> not check debug builds (-Og or -O0) for the fortify stuff. Another is to
> allow
On Wednesday, 3 May 2023 12:21:02 CEST Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Diederik de Haas prepared importing Linux 6.3 in the Debian kernel
> repository. The salsa test pipeline fails with an issue reported by blhc
> as can be seen on
>
>
Package: blhc
Version: 0.13-5
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: didi.deb...@cknow.org, uklei...@debian.org
Hello,
Diederik de Haas prepared importing Linux 6.3 in the Debian kernel
repository. The salsa test pipeline fails with an issue reported by blhc
as can be seen on
5 matches
Mail list logo