On 31.05.2023 15:33, Markus Koschany wrote:
Hi Markus,
Thanks for your help and explanations Max. I am going to release an updated
version for Buster soon. Apparently I somehow missed the
io_kpse_check_permissions function despite following the "Patching older
versions" paragraph.
The buster
Thanks for your help and explanations Max. I am going to release an updated
version for Buster soon. Apparently I somehow missed the
io_kpse_check_permissions function despite following the "Patching older
versions" paragraph.
Best,
Markus
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On 31.05.2023 09:23, Max Chernoff wrote:
Hello Max,
To fix this, there are 3 options (pick 1):
1. Cherry-pick *both* 5650c067 and b8b71a25
2. Follow the instructions in [5]
3. Apply the appropriate patch from [6]
Option (3) will the easiest, but it will only work if your LuaTeX
Hi all,
> Version: 2018.20181218.49446-1+deb10u1
> This is LuaTeX, Version 1.07.0 (TeX Live 2019/dev/Debian)
> LaTeX2e <2018-12-01>
This is a very odd set of versions. "2018.20181218.49446" implies
TL2018, but your LuaTeX banner says "TeX Live 2019/dev/Debian". TL2019
contains LuaTeX version
Hi Hilmar, hi Markus,
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:32:24PM +0200, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
> On 30.05.2023 20:37, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> Hi Salvatore, hi Markus,
>
> > No, buster is under LTS support which does not have point releases.
> > But as I understand this is a regression from DLA
Hi Hilmar,
Am Dienstag, dem 30.05.2023 um 23:32 +0200 schrieb Preuße, Hilmar:
> On 30.05.2023 20:37, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> Hi Salvatore, hi Markus,
>
> > No, buster is under LTS support which does not have point releases.
> > But as I understand this is a regression from DLA
On 30.05.2023 20:37, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi Salvatore, hi Markus,
No, buster is under LTS support which does not have point releases.
But as I understand this is a regression from DLA DLA-3427-1, so a
regression update might be worth to be issues for it, once there is a
fix known.
Hi Hilmar,
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 05:25:33PM +0200, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
> On 28.05.2023 20:52, Philippe SWARTVAGHER wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > (not sure if this bug report should be against texlive-luatex or
> > texlive-binaries...)
> >
> > I upgraded texlive-binaries (and other related
On 28.05.2023 20:52, Philippe SWARTVAGHER wrote:
Hello,
(not sure if this bug report should be against texlive-luatex or
texlive-binaries...)
I upgraded texlive-binaries (and other related packages) from
2018.20181218.49446-1 to 2018.20181218.49446-1+deb10u1 on a Debian
Buster. Since then, I
> LaTeX2e <2018-12-01>
> ...-dist/tex/luatex/luaotfload/luaotfload-configuration.lua:292:
attempt to cal
> l method 'read' (a nil value)
I am seeing the exact same issue. Downgrading "texlive-binaries" to
"2018.20181218.49446-1" has fixed it for me (while leaving all other
packages up to
Package: texlive-binaries
Version: 2018.20181218.49446-1+deb10u1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
(not sure if this bug report should be against texlive-luatex or
texlive-binaries...)
I upgraded texlive-binaries (and other related packages) from
2018.20181218.49446-1 to
11 matches
Mail list logo