Hello again,
Le 29/06/2023 à 21:22, László Böszörményi (GCS) a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 9:15 PM Pierre Gruet wrote:
Le 29/06/2023 à 18:41, László Böszörményi (GCS) a écrit :
Do you have your proposed package somewhere? I would also like to
check it with the updated protobuf package
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 9:15 PM Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Le 29/06/2023 à 18:41, László Böszörményi (GCS) a écrit :
> > Do you have your proposed package somewhere? I would also like to
> > check it with the updated protobuf package before uploading.
> You can find it in the public repo
>
Hi Laszlo,
Thanks for looking at my proposal, I am glad you consider it fit!
Le 29/06/2023 à 18:41, László Böszörményi (GCS) a écrit :
Hi Pierre,
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 4:39 PM Pierre Gruet wrote:
- removing j2objc from the pom.xml so that rdeps don't look for this
Debian-unpackaged
Hi Pierre,
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 4:39 PM Pierre Gruet wrote:
> - removing j2objc from the pom.xml so that rdeps don't look for this
> Debian-unpackaged artifact (touches d/p/no_j2objc.patch);
Thanks for all of your work on this! I see you added this as a patch,
but not included in the series
Control: retitle -1 please rewrite the Java packaging to build rdeps
Control: affects -1 src:genomicsdb
Hello,
This is a summary email for this bug thread as I tested locally some
changes to the packaging, so that rdeps relying on the
/usr/share/java/protobuf-util.jar can build and run.
5 matches
Mail list logo
