Bug#1044079: augur: FTBFS with pandas 2.0

2024-02-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 pending Hi, thanks a lot for this hint. Am Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:36:05AM +0100 schrieb s3v: > I don't know if renaming is a drop-in replacement Me neither but I simply trust that its passing its test suite. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Bug#1044079: augur: FTBFS with pandas 2.0

2024-02-14 Thread s3v
Dear Maintainer, parse_time_string() function was renamed in parse_datetime_string_with_reso() for better naming reasons [1] Replacing this occurrence in augur/parse.py makes the package buildable. I don't know if renaming is a drop-in replacement, I see this caveat:     # NB: This will break

Bug#1044079: augur: FTBFS with pandas 2.0

2023-09-06 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: tags -1 + help It looks like there are no plans upstream to fix the issue for now, and the item was closed on that ground. I would welcome help, as the code makes use of a pandas' internal to make something smart with dates, and I didn't make sense of what happens despite some digging

Bug#1044079: augur: FTBFS with pandas 2.0

2023-08-13 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: src:augur Version: 22.1.0-1 Control: block 1043240 by -1 augur fails to build with pandas 2.0, currently in experimental. Build log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/680698719/buildlog_ubuntu-mantic-amd64.augur_22.1.0-1_BUILDING.txt.gz Autopkgtest log: