On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 07:04:02AM +, 陈 晟祺 wrote:
Hi,
> > zfs-dkms is the failsafe in case the zfs-modules- package is
> > *not* installed
> > (for example, because this is the first slow box I'm installing this kernel
> > or this version of
> > zfs-dkms on and I don't yet have a
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: tag -1 + wontfix
> zfs-dkms is the failsafe in case the zfs-modules- package is
> *not* installed
> (for example, because this is the first slow box I'm installing this kernel
> or this version of
> zfs-dkms on and I don't yet have a corresponding
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 08:19:45AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Andras Korn]
> > I have computers that take forever to build kernel modules; therefore,
> > while I have zfs-dkms installed as a failsafe, I also strive to always
> > install zfs-modules- preemptively.
>
> How do you imagine
[Andras Korn]
> I have computers that take forever to build kernel modules; therefore,
> while I have zfs-dkms installed as a failsafe, I also strive to always
> install zfs-modules- preemptively.
How do you imagine zfs-dkms should work as a failsafe if it is not built
when the zfs-modules-
4 matches
Mail list logo