Julian Andres Klode (2023-12-25):
> We picked the previous XFS patch for extent parsing but did not pick
> this one because it had not been merged at that point yet, the fix
> only got merged two weeks or so ago, and we didn't want to take chances
> and pick it ahead of time as it's security
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 04:33:36PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Julian Andres Klode (2023-12-25):
> > The final grub 2.12 that includes the fix should hit unstable in the
> > middle of January. As you might be aware many are busy with family
> > stuff and holiday celebrations right now.
>
>
Julian Andres Klode (2023-12-25):
> The final grub 2.12 that includes the fix should hit unstable in the
> middle of January. As you might be aware many are busy with family
> stuff and holiday celebrations right now.
Sure. I wasn't aware an upstream release was in the pipes, only that
patches
Control: tag 1059424 patch
(switching to the cloned xfsprogs bug)
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 09:15:59AM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Control: clone -1 -2
> Control: reassign -2 xfsprogs
>
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 11:11:53PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Anthony Iliopoulos
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 xfsprogs
On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 11:11:53PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anthony Iliopoulos (2023-10-30):
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 04:19:32PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> > > Anthony Iliopoulos writes:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Oct 29, 2023
Hi,
Anthony Iliopoulos (2023-10-30):
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 04:19:32PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> > Anthony Iliopoulos writes:
> >
> > > On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 09:02:01PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> > ...
> > >> error: invalid XFS directory entry.
> > ...
> > > This issue exists
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 04:19:32PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> Anthony Iliopoulos writes:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 09:02:01PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> ...
> >> error: invalid XFS directory entry.
> ...
> > This issue exists independently of the large extent counter, and it is
> >
Anthony Iliopoulos writes:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 09:02:01PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
...
>> error: invalid XFS directory entry.
...
> This issue exists independently of the large extent counter, and it is
> related to grub commit ef7850c75 ("fs/xfs: Fix issues found while
> fuzzing the
On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 09:02:01PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> Philip Hands writes:
>
> > Anthony Iliopoulos writes:
> > ...
> >> Yeap it is due to nrext64, I've submitted a patch to grub (should have
> >> cc'ed linux-xfs..)
> >>
> >>
Philip Hands writes:
> Anthony Iliopoulos writes:
> ...
>> Yeap it is due to nrext64, I've submitted a patch to grub (should have
>> cc'ed linux-xfs..)
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/grub-devel/20231026095339.31802-1-ail...@suse.com/
>
> That certainly seems to fix this bug.
... but sadly that
Control: reassign -1 grub2
Please consider applying the identified patch so that debian installer does not
break installing on XFS.
Anthony Iliopoulos writes:
...
> Yeap it is due to nrext64, I've submitted a patch to grub (should have
> cc'ed linux-xfs..)
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/grub-devel/20231026095339.31802-1-ail...@suse.com/
That certainly seems to fix this bug.
I tested it by applying that patch to grub, and then
"Darrick J. Wong" writes:
...
> Curiously, this log says:
>
> Oct 24 05:35:32 in-target: Setting up xfsprogs (6.4.0-1) ...^M
>
> So ... is it running 6.4 and not 6.5?
The daily test versions of Debian-Installer draw components from
"unstable", which is where the 6.5 version is at present, which
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 06:19:33PM +0200, Anthony Iliopoulos wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 08:45:05AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> >
> > mkfs.xfs in xfsprogs 6.5 turned on both the large extent counts and
> > reverse mapping btree features by default. My guess is that grub hasn't
> >
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 08:45:05AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>
> mkfs.xfs in xfsprogs 6.5 turned on both the large extent counts and
> reverse mapping btree features by default. My guess is that grub hasn't
> caught up with those changes to the ondisk format yet.
>
> Ah, yeah, upstream grub
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 05:20:42PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote:
> Philip Hands writes:
> ...
> > Could this be related to #1051543?
> >
> > I'll try testing D-I while using the patch from that bug, to see if that
> > helps.
>
> It seems (to me at least) that the patch there does not apply
Philip Hands writes:
...
> Could this be related to #1051543?
>
> I'll try testing D-I while using the patch from that bug, to see if that
> helps.
It seems (to me at least) that the patch there does not apply usefully
to the version we're talking about, so I'll leave it to people that know
Hi Phil,
Am 27.10.23 um 10:23 schrieb Philip Hands:
Could this be related to #1051543?
I'll try testing D-I while using the patch from that bug, to see if that helps.
Okay. I am going to wait for more info from you. If that does not help,
can you please explain which of xfsprogs-udeb's
Package: xfsprogs-udeb
Version: 6.5.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: openqa
While doing openQA testing of Debian-Installer, I notice that XFS installs
started failing a few days ago, and comparing the versions of udebs that changed
between success and failure, the
19 matches
Mail list logo
