Hi Nis,
On 2023-11-16 17:31:13 +0100, Nis Martensen wrote:
> On 14.11.2023 15.17, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> >> Checking for newer versions at madison and
> >> https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> >>
> >> Your version (6.1.55-1) of linux-image-6.1.0-13-amd64 appears to be out of
> >> date.
>
Hi Vincent,
On 14.11.2023 15.17, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> Checking for newer versions at madison and
>> https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
>>
>> Your version (6.1.55-1) of linux-image-6.1.0-13-amd64 appears to be out of
>> date.
>> The following newer release(s) are available in the Debian
Cc'ing Reportbug Maintainers.
On 2023-11-14 14:51:18 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Going back to what reportbug says, it still outputs
>
> [...]
> Getting status for linux-image-6.1.0-13-amd64...
> Verifying package integrity...
> Checking for newer versions at madison and
>
On 2023-11-14 13:45:21 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> But "apt show -a linux-image-6.1.0-13-amd64" just gives the 6.1.55-1
> version (no 6.1.55+1~bpo11+1 version), and
>
> apt install -t bullseye-backports linux-image-6.1.0-13-amd64
>
> also thinks that 6.1.55-1 is the version to be
Control: reassign -1 src:linux
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 01:45:21PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 2.6.1
> Severity: important
>
> When I want to report a bug against the Linux kernel, reportbug
> recommends to use bullseye-backports to get a more recent version
> (even
Package: apt
Version: 2.6.1
Severity: important
When I want to report a bug against the Linux kernel, reportbug
recommends to use bullseye-backports to get a more recent version
(even though this is currently a bookworm based machine):
Your version (6.1.55-1) of linux-image-6.1.0-13-amd64
6 matches
Mail list logo
