Bug#1059236: closed by Gianfranco Costamagna (Re: Bug#1057954: RFS: nanomsg/1.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- nanomsg utilities)

2024-02-20 Thread Phil Wyett
Control: reopen -1 On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 08:12 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello, > > > I think I need advice here. I am tempted to breaks replace and upgrade all > > to > > libnanomsg6 > > and then work with upstream on SONAMES etc. How would you and Tobias > > proceed? > > yes,

Bug#1059236: closed by Gianfranco Costamagna (Re: Bug#1057954: RFS: nanomsg/1.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- nanomsg utilities)

2024-02-20 Thread Phil Wyett
On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 08:12 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello, > > > I think I need advice here. I am tempted to breaks replace and upgrade all > > to > > libnanomsg6 > > and then work with upstream on SONAMES etc. How would you and Tobias > > proceed? > > yes, this is correct.

Bug#1059236: closed by Gianfranco Costamagna (Re: Bug#1057954: RFS: nanomsg/1.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- nanomsg utilities)

2024-02-20 Thread Phil Wyett
On Thu, 2024-02-15 at 08:18 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > 1059236 Hi Gianfranco, I think I need advice here. I am tempted to breaks replace and upgrade all to libnanomsg6 and then work with upstream on SONAMES etc. How would you and Tobias proceed? Regards Phil -- Playing the

Bug#1059236: closed by Gianfranco Costamagna (Re: Bug#1057954: RFS: nanomsg/1.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- nanomsg utilities)

2024-02-20 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, >I think I need advice here. I am tempted to breaks replace and upgrade all to >libnanomsg6 >and then work with upstream on SONAMES etc. How would you and Tobias proceed? yes, this is correct. Change soname and go for experimental, and ask upstream to change soname only if symbols are