On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 03:36:30PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> FWIW, I just filed #1061487 with the proposed stable update.
awesome. and fwiw, the attached patch there looks sensible to me! ;)
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 07:21:22PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 07:49:53PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > Yes, I did fully intend to submit it for stable-updates after it had
> > spent a couple of days in unstable and possibly migrated to
> > testing.
Hi Peter,
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 07:49:53PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Yes, I did fully intend to submit it for stable-updates after it had
> spent a couple of days in unstable and possibly migrated to
> testing. Thanks, though - for all you knew, I had not even
> considered it, so thanks
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 02:36:24PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> hi,
>
> from reading the d/changelog entry "Enable the read-only BerkeleyDB backend.
> Closes: #1061258" it sounds like it should be possible to have this fix
> in bookworm too, via the upcoming point release?!
>
> I think it would
hi,
from reading the d/changelog entry "Enable the read-only BerkeleyDB backend.
Closes: #1061258" it sounds like it should be possible to have this fix
in bookworm too, via the upcoming point release?!
I think it would qualify, as it's breaking updating Qubes dom0 via
a debian based update-vm
5 matches
Mail list logo
