Hi

On 25/1/24 20:59, Martin wrote:
> Hi Praveen,
> 
> IMHO, that's a good idea!

Yes, sounds nice.

> Esp. I like to have a config that is as similar as possible to Snikket,
> for those, who like to selfhost, but want to avoid docker.
> 
> I'm not sure, if that package should be part of prosody itself or if it
> should be a separate source package with a binary package, that depends
> on both prosody and prosody-modules.

another source package sounds too much. It can be included in prosody source.

Cheers

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|   ,''`.                                             Victor Seva |
|  : :' :                      linuxman...@torreviejawireless.org |
|  `. `'  PGP: 8F19 CADC D42A 42D4 5563  730C 51A0 9B18 CF5A 5068 |
|    `-                                          Debian Developer |
  -----------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x7D7B65C42A0EC8B2.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Reply via email to