Bug#1061908: cppdb: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-28 Thread Steve Langasek
Dear maintainer, Please find attached a final version of this patch for the time_t transition. This patch is being uploaded to unstable. Note that this adds a versioned build-dependency on dpkg-dev, to guard against accidental backports with a wrong ABI. Thanks! -- System Information: Debian

Bug#1061908: cppdb: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-04 Thread Tobias Frost
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 12:45:20AM +, mwhud...@debian.org wrote: > Source: cppdb > Followup-For: Bug #1061908 > > Apologies, thanks to operator error (i.e. I messed up) the diff attached to > this bug is not the one that was uploaded to experimental. Please see the > patch > attached to this

Bug#1061908: cppdb: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-31 Thread mwhudson
Source: cppdb Followup-For: Bug #1061908 Apologies, thanks to operator error (i.e. I messed up) the diff attached to this bug is not the one that was uploaded to experimental. Please see the patch attached to this message. -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers unstable

Bug#1061908: cppdb: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-30 Thread Tobias Frost
Hi, It seems that I've missed the MBF announcement… regarding the NMU, please go ahead, but make it a Team upload (it is in the Debian salsa namespace, so this shouldnt be a NMU) and commit your changes to the repository. Thanks -- tobi Am Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 01:26:06AM + schrieb

Bug#1061908: cppdb: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-29 Thread mwhudson
Source: cppdb Version: 0.3.1+dfsg-9 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond