Bug#1061931: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1061931: biosquid: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

Steve Langasek, on 2024-02-28: > Please find attached a final version of this patch for the time_t > transition. This patch is being uploaded to unstable. NMU acknowledged, thank you! :) -- .''`. Étienne Mollier : :' : pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent

Bug#1061931: biosquid: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

Dear maintainer, Please find attached a final version of this patch for the time_t transition. This patch is being uploaded to unstable. Note that this adds a versioned build-dependency on dpkg-dev, to guard against accidental backports with a wrong ABI. Thanks! -- System Information: Debian

Bug#1061931: biosquid: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

Source: biosquid Version: 1.9g+cvs20050121-15 Followup-For: Bug #1061931 Hi Andreas, FYI your emails did not make it to my mailserver because they fail SPF for your sending domain; it appears your mails are going via the Debian mailservers but you are using a non-Debian sender address? So

Bug#1061931: biosquid: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

Control: tags -1 - pending patch Unfortunately, it turns out that due to the use of d-shlibs this patch is insufficient. d-shlibs appears to need patching for every ABI transition, and only knows about the long-finished c102, ldbl, and v5 transitions (which misses several other ABI transitions

Bug#1061931: biosquid: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

Source: biosquid Version: 1.9g+cvs20050121-13 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond