On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 9:15 PM Attila Szalay wrote:
>
> Ok. I re-checked the patch and realized that I checked the only wrong
> module (the only one which is arch all and not any).
>
> So my apologies for the fuzz and will apply the patch with the
> appropriate changes.
>
> But here my original
Ok. I re-checked the patch and realized that I checked the only wrong
module (the only one which is arch all and not any).
So my apologies for the fuzz and will apply the patch with the
appropriate changes.
But here my original reply too:
I admit that I joined late to this conversation. But my
Hi Attila,
On Fri, 2024-04-05 at 09:47 +0100, Attila Szalay wrote:
> Based on https://wiki.debian.org/NonMaintainerUpload, the binNMU
> should
> be careful
I think you are confusing binNMUs and NMUs.
See https://wiki.debian.org/binNMU
They are handled more or less automatic as soon as a rebuild
Hello Steve,
I do understand your concern about the time_t structure change and I
also admit that there are some room of improvement how the syslog-ng
package manage the library versioned dependency, but this is not the
solution.
Based on https://wiki.debian.org/NonMaintainerUpload, the binNMU
4 matches
Mail list logo
