I sent this patch out to sta...@vger.kernel.org. Everyone should be
CCd. Thanks for your help in confirming the fix works.
-Jordan
Hi
Would you be able to confirm that the attached patch fixes your issue as well?
Yes it does.
@debian maintainers: is it possible to include this patch in the next
point release?
Thank you for your work,
Valentin
Hi Valentin,
Would you be able to confirm that the attached patch fixes your issue as well?
-Jordan
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 9:42 AM Jordan Rife wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 3:37 AM Valentin Kleibel wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jordan, hi all
> >
> > > Just a quick look comparing dlm_tcp_listen_bind
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 3:37 AM Valentin Kleibel wrote:
>
> Hi Jordan, hi all
>
> > Just a quick look comparing dlm_tcp_listen_bind between the latest 6.1
> > and 6.6 stable branches,
> > it looks like there is a mismatch here with the dlm_local_addr[0] parameter.
> >
> > 6.1
> >
> >
> >
Hi Jordan, hi all
Just a quick look comparing dlm_tcp_listen_bind between the latest 6.1
and 6.6 stable branches,
it looks like there is a mismatch here with the dlm_local_addr[0] parameter.
6.1
static int dlm_tcp_listen_bind(struct socket *sock)
{
int addr_len;
/* Bind to our port */
Hi Alexander,
On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 04:27:48PM -0500, Alexander Aring wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 1:33 PM Jordan Rife wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 2:39 AM Salvatore Bonaccorso
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Valentin, hi all
> > >
> > > [This is about a regression reported in
6 matches
Mail list logo