Bug#1063376: How to ask efficiently for removal of 32 bit architectures of about 40 packages (Was: reverse dependenc)

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I hope there is some better solution than sending single bug reports > for those packages. If ftpmaster tooling really needs single bug > reports I wonder how I can automatically create such bug reports with > always the same text,

Bug#1063376: How to ask efficiently for removal of 32 bit architectures of about 40 packages (Was: reverse dependenc)

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > Am Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 06:25:50PM + schrieb Thorsten Alteholz: > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > > > please file one RM bug for each package that needs to be partially removed. > > This needs to be done even for

Bug#1063376: How to ask efficiently for removal of 32 bit architectures of about 40 packages (Was: reverse dependenc)

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 08:26:40PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > do mutt -s "RM: remove $package" -i tmpfile $package the 2nd $package in that line must be sub...@bugs.debian.org -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀

Bug#1063376: How to ask efficiently for removal of 32 bit architectures of about 40 packages (Was: reverse dependenc)

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I hope there is some better solution than sending single bug reports > for those packages. If ftpmaster tooling really needs single bug > reports I wonder how I can automatically create such bug reports with > always the same text,

Bug#1063376: How to ask efficiently for removal of 32 bit architectures of about 40 packages (Was: reverse dependenc)

Hi, Am Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 06:25:50PM + schrieb Thorsten Alteholz: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > please file one RM bug for each package that needs to be partially removed. > This needs to be done even for dependencies of dependencies. > Please remove the moreinfo tag once that is done.