On Sat, 2024-03-02 at 03:54 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> rustc-web (1.70.0+dfsg1-7~deb12u2) bookworm; urgency=medium
>
> * Non-maintainer upload.
> * Increase allowed test failures on armhf and ppc64el to fix
> FTBFS.
> * Provide Conflicts/Replaces for rust*-mozilla*, which could still
On 3/2/24 02:00, Andres Salomon wrote:
Actually, scratch that; I had missed #1064563.
I'll redo the deb11u2 package with conflicts/replaces for that, as well,
and then resend it shortly.
On 3/2/24 01:49, Andres Salomon wrote:
Okay, here's an updated package with fixes:
rustc-web
Actually, scratch that; I had missed #1064563.
I'll redo the deb11u2 package with conflicts/replaces for that, as well,
and then resend it shortly.
On 3/2/24 01:49, Andres Salomon wrote:
Okay, here's an updated package with fixes:
rustc-web (1.70.0+dfsg1-7~deb12u2) bookworm; urgency=medium
On 2/28/24 01:23, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 15:00 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
So it looks like I'll need a new upload to fix two bookworm
architecture
build failures (armhf and ppc64el), and also to fix #1064562. Should
I
file a new release.d.o bug, or continue using this
On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 15:00 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> So it looks like I'll need a new upload to fix two bookworm
> architecture
> build failures (armhf and ppc64el), and also to fix #1064562. Should
> I
> file a new release.d.o bug, or continue using this one?
Given that both issues are
So it looks like I'll need a new upload to fix two bookworm architecture
build failures (armhf and ppc64el), and also to fix #1064562. Should I
file a new release.d.o bug, or continue using this one?
(I'm ignoring armel and mipsel build failures, since firefox-esr hasn't
built on either
package release.debian.org
tags 1064031 = bookworm pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: rustc-web
Version:
7 matches
Mail list logo
