Hi,
Since launchpad builds are quite busy, I have done testing in mantic chroot.
Expected behaviour:
- I can co-install i386 and amd64 openjdk-8 [done]
- i386 will print the warning message when the accessibility provider
is not found
- amd64 will throw an exception.
I have updated
Dixi quod…
>I’ll probably also throw it on Launchpad to test-build, then see
It WFM, I can install both at the same time in a focal/amd64 chroot.
>if it’s coïnstallable. But I would very much appreciate review
>from your side.
I’ll upload once the time_t-64 transition in Debian has progressed,
Hi Vladimir,
does this patch (untested) do the right thing?
https://evolvis.org/plugins/scmgit/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=alioth/openjdk-8.git;a=commitdiff;h=7cbff55df0f46b7c324b686932b99a087f0ff0d6
(btw, DEP 3 patch headers do need an empty line between the
header and the patch)
I implemented what
Vladimir Petko dixit:
>I apologise for the delay. I have a draft attached, but I am waiting
>for the ppa build[1] to run and test the changes.
Hmmh. I think you cannot set with_bridge to empty because
that also changes the files installed.
Building with bridge seems to work. Where is the actual
Hi,
I apologise for the delay. I have a draft attached, but I am waiting
for the ppa build[1] to run and test the changes.
Best Regards,
Vladimir.
[1]
https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/october-21/+sourcepub/15830915/+listing-archive-extra
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 12:43 PM
Vladimir Petko dixit:
>I will prepare the patch for Ubuntu stable releases/i386 and update the bug.
Did you have any luck with this?
bye,
//mirabilos
--
15:41⎜ Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-)
Hi Vladimir,
>Thank you!!!
sure. I don’t want to make your life harder, but I did that change
to address another installability bug on those platforms ;-)
>I will prepare the patch for Ubuntu stable releases/i386 and update the bug.
OK, wonderful.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
„Cool,
Hi,
Thank you!!!
I will prepare the patch for Ubuntu stable releases/i386 and update the bug.
Best Regards,
Vladimir.
Hi Vladimir,
>Would it be possible to consider the alternative approach: add
>"do-not-throw-when-accesisibility-provider-not-found" patch on i386 in
>line with openjdk-11 +?
Sounds like a plan. For Ubuntu only, then?
>I had a chat on #ubuntu-release indicating that there is a little
>chance for
Hi,
Would it be possible to consider the alternative approach: add
"do-not-throw-when-accesisibility-provider-not-found" patch on i386 in
line with openjdk-11 +? I had a chat on #ubuntu-release indicating
that there is a little chance for me to argue for including the bridge
into stable releases
Hi Vladimir,
> Would it be possible to consider the following changes:
>- d/JB-jre-headless.postinst.in: check that /usr/share/binfmts exists
> before trying to delete it.
that’s fine, will be merged, thanks.
>- d/rules: build without atk bridge on i386 for Ubuntu versions that
>
Package: openjdk-8
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
Dear Maintainer,
openjdk-8 402-ga-2 introduced changes that make the package fail to install
in i386 Ubuntu noble.
binfmt-support might not be installed and
12 matches
Mail list logo
