Bug#1064369: gobject-introspection dropped versioned dependency on python3

2024-03-03 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: severity -1 important On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 23:15:09 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 20.02.24 22:50, Simon McVittie wrote: > > If gobject-introspection explicitly depended on gobject-introspection-bin > > by name (not just via a virtual package), would that help? > > I think that

Bug#1064369: gobject-introspection dropped versioned dependency on python3

2024-02-27 Thread Simon McVittie
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 23:07:33 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 23.02.24 22:10, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > > Since glib and gobject-introspection have migrated out of > > noble-proposed, is there still a need to keep this bug open? > > Suppose you would start again building glib2.0 (and depending

Bug#1064369: gobject-introspection dropped versioned dependency on python3

2024-02-27 Thread Matthias Klose
On 23.02.24 22:10, Jeremy Bícha wrote: Matthias, Since glib and gobject-introspection have migrated out of noble-proposed, is there still a need to keep this bug open? I'm unsure how many packages are affected by this. I need to trust your assessment for that. Suppose you would start again

Bug#1064369: gobject-introspection dropped versioned dependency on python3

2024-02-23 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Matthias, Since glib and gobject-introspection have migrated out of noble-proposed, is there still a need to keep this bug open? Thank you, Jeremy Bícha

Bug#1064369: gobject-introspection dropped versioned dependency on python3

2024-02-20 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 6:27 PM Simon McVittie wrote: > It's unfortunate that Ubuntu is trying to go directly from > gobject-introspection 1.78.1-6 to 1.79.x, without ever getting the higher > 1.78.1-x revisions that are in Debian testing: that would have decoupled > the introduction of new

Bug#1064369: gobject-introspection dropped versioned dependency on python3

2024-02-20 Thread Simon McVittie
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 23:15:09 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 20.02.24 22:50, Simon McVittie wrote: > > What is the situation that is going wrong in autopkgtest? Can you perhaps > > provide a log? > > see > https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/m/meson/noble/ppc64el > > the one triggered

Bug#1064369: gobject-introspection dropped versioned dependency on python3

2024-02-20 Thread Matthias Klose
On 20.02.24 22:50, Simon McVittie wrote: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 22:15:21 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: The package had in the past dependencies of the form python3 (<< 3.12), python3 (>= 3.11~), python3:any the new one just python3:any This leads to badly

Bug#1064369: gobject-introspection dropped versioned dependency on python3

2024-02-20 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 22:15:21 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > The package had in the past dependencies of the form > > python3 (<< 3.12), python3 (>= 3.11~), python3:any > > the new one just > > python3:any > > This leads to badly triggered autopkg tests, with

Bug#1064369: gobject-introspection dropped versioned dependency on python3

2024-02-20 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: gobject-introspection Version: 1.78.1-15 Severity: serious Tags: sid trixie The package had in the past dependencies of the form python3 (<< 3.12), python3 (>= 3.11~), python3:any the new one just python3:any This leads to badly triggered autopkg tests, with a mismatching