On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 7:24 PM Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> It is therefore not obvious that we should rename the package to
> 'libevolution-t64' as part of this transition.
>
> Looking at the archive, the only packages that depend on this package
> are also built from the evolution source
Package: libevolution
Version: 3.50.3-1
Severity: important
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainers,
Analysis of the archive for the 64-bit time_t transition[0][1]
identifies libevolution as an affected package, on the basis that the
headers could not be compiled and
2 matches
Mail list logo
