On 24/04/2024 23.15, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Is this apparent duplication correct? Sorry not to have spotted it before.
Yes, that's exactly how I want it. The history of n-g-d as part of
n-g-d-tesla-470. The changelog entry is duplicated because of the CVE
list, otherwise it would have
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 10:19:45AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470 (470.239.06-1~deb12u1) bookworm;
> urgency=medium
>
> * Rebuild for bookworm.
>
> -- Andreas Beckmann Thu, 29 Feb 2024 02:41:42 +0100
>
> nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470 (470.239.06-1)
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Please go ahead.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Please go ahead.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
Let's update nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470 in bookworm to a new
upstream release fixing a few CVEs.
The only effective packaging change resulting from switching
5 matches
Mail list logo
