Hi!
On 2024-03-12 10:46, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I think this change might be a pragmatic way to shorten the critical
> path for the time64 transition.
The patch works fine indeed, and stunnel4 can be built successfully on
armhf with it. I agree that it should be applied.
It seems however that
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 20:09:06 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Thanks for proposing this, but I think these should be ifneq instead
> of ifeq
Actually, this patch also still allowed dh_auto_test to run on the
time64-affected architectures, which would presumably fail because the
tests'
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 19:54:00 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> +ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS)$(filter i386,$(DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU)),32)
> execute_before_dh_auto_test:
> env PYTHONPATH='$(CURDIR)/debian/tests/python' \
> python3 -B -u -m struntime \
>
Source: stunnel4
Version: 3:5.72-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hello Peter,
In #-devel a couple of us (not related to the people working on the t64
transition) thought it would be a good idea if stunnel4 could
temporarily disable tests on the involved architectures (all 32 bits
archs except
4 matches
Mail list logo
