Source: spectools Version: 201601r1-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled -Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more information, see https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2024-03-13_-Werror.3Dimplicit-function-declaration Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -D_DEBUG -I./ -g -O2 > -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. > -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat > -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -c spectool_net_server.c -o > spectool_net_server.o > wispy_hw_dbx.c: In function ‘wispydbx_usb_setposition’: > wispy_hw_dbx.c:1289:27: warning: assignment to ‘uint8_t *’ {aka ‘unsigned > char *’} from incompatible pointer type ‘wispydbx_rfsettings_v2 *’ {aka > ‘struct _wispydbx_rfsettings_v2 *’} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] > 1289 | use_rfset = &rfset2; > | ^ > wispy_hw_dbx.c:1312:27: warning: assignment to ‘uint8_t *’ {aka ‘unsigned > char *’} from incompatible pointer type ‘wispydbx_rfsettings *’ {aka ‘struct > _wispydbx_rfsettings *’} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] > 1312 | use_rfset = &rfset; > | ^ > spectool_net_client.c: In function ‘spectool_netcli_block_sweep’: > spectool_net_client.c:367:62: warning: format ‘%u’ expects argument of type > ‘unsigned int’, but argument 6 has type ‘long unsigned int’ [-Wformat=] > 367 | snprintf(errstr, SPECTOOL_ERROR_MAX, "Got > sweep frame too small to hold " > | > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > spectool_net_client.c:368:99: note: format string is defined here > 368 | "indicated number of > samples, bailing - %u samples %u < %u", > | > ~^ > | > | > | > unsigned int > | > %lu > wispy_hw_gen1.c: In function ‘wispy1_usb_init_path’: > wispy_hw_gen1.c:296:15: error: implicit declaration of function > ‘wispy24x_adler_checksum’; did you mean ‘wispy1_adler_checksum’? > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 296 | cid = wispy24x_adler_checksum(combopath, 128); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | wispy1_adler_checksum > ubertooth_hw_u1.c: In function ‘ubertooth_u1_device_scan’: > ubertooth_hw_u1.c:266:41: error: implicit declaration of function > ‘wispy24x_adler_checksum’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 266 | > wispy24x_adler_checksum(combopath, 128); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > spectool_net_client.c:426:17: warning: ignoring return value of ‘write’ > declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result] > 426 | write(((spectool_net_dev_aux *) > (sni->phydev->auxptr))->spipe[1], "0", 1); > | > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > wispy_hw_gen1.c: In function ‘wispy1_usb_open’: > wispy_hw_gen1.c:557:21: error: implicit declaration of function > ‘wispy24x_usb_detach_hack’; did you mean ‘wispy_usb_detach_hack’? > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 557 | if (wispy24x_usb_detach_hack(auxptr->devhdl, 0, > phydev->errstr) < 0) { > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | wispy_usb_detach_hack > spectool_net_client.c: In function ‘spectool_netcli_enabledev’: > spectool_net_client.c:517:9: warning: ignoring return value of ‘pipe’ > declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result] > 517 | pipe(aux->spipe); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > spectool_net_client.c: In function ‘spectool_net_poll’: > spectool_net_client.c:634:9: warning: ignoring return value of ‘read’ > declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result] > 634 | read(((spectool_net_dev_aux *) phydev->auxptr)->spipe[0], > junk, 8); > | > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > spectool_raw.c: In function ‘main’: > spectool_raw.c:320:29: error: implicit declaration of function > ‘spectool_netcli_writepoll’; did you mean ‘spectool_netcli_poll’? > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 320 | if (spectool_netcli_writepoll(&sr, errstr) < > 0) { > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | spectool_netcli_poll > spectool_raw.c:376:48: warning: too many arguments for format > [-Wformat-extra-args] > 376 | printf("Configured device %u > (%s)\n", > | > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ubertooth_hw_u1.c:259:61: warning: ‘%s’ directive output may be truncated > writing up to 4096 bytes into a region of size 64 [-Wformat-truncation=] > 259 | snprintf(auxpair->bus, 64, "%s", > bus->dirname); > | ^~ > In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:906, > from ubertooth_hw_u1.c:16: > In function ‘snprintf’, > inlined from ‘ubertooth_u1_device_scan’ at ubertooth_hw_u1.c:259:5: > /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:54:10: note: ‘__builtin_snprintf’ > output between 1 and 4097 bytes into a destination of size 64 > 54 | return __builtin___snprintf_chk (__s, __n, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > 55 | __glibc_objsize (__s), __fmt, > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > 56 | __va_arg_pack ()); > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ubertooth_hw_u1.c: In function ‘ubertooth_u1_device_scan’: > ubertooth_hw_u1.c:260:61: warning: ‘%s’ directive output may be truncated > writing up to 4096 bytes into a region of size 64 [-Wformat-truncation=] > 260 | snprintf(auxpair->dev, 64, "%s", > dev->filename); > | ^~ > In function ‘snprintf’, > inlined from ‘ubertooth_u1_device_scan’ at ubertooth_hw_u1.c:260:5: > /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:54:10: note: ‘__builtin_snprintf’ > output between 1 and 4097 bytes into a destination of size 64 > 54 | return __builtin___snprintf_chk (__s, __n, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > 55 | __glibc_objsize (__s), __fmt, > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > 56 | __va_arg_pack ()); > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > wispy_hw_24x.c: In function ‘wispy24x_usb_device_scan’: > wispy_hw_24x.c:274:61: warning: ‘%s’ directive output may be truncated > writing up to 4096 bytes into a region of size 64 [-Wformat-truncation=] > 274 | snprintf(auxpair->bus, 64, "%s", > bus->dirname); > | ^~ > In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:906, > from wispy_hw_24x.c:17: > In function ‘snprintf’, > inlined from ‘wispy24x_usb_device_scan’ at wispy_hw_24x.c:274:5: > /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:54:10: note: ‘__builtin_snprintf’ > output between 1 and 4097 bytes into a destination of size 64 > 54 | return __builtin___snprintf_chk (__s, __n, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > 55 | __glibc_objsize (__s), __fmt, > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > 56 | __va_arg_pack ()); > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > wispy_hw_24x.c: In function ‘wispy24x_usb_device_scan’: > wispy_hw_24x.c:275:61: warning: ‘%s’ directive output may be truncated > writing up to 4096 bytes into a region of size 64 [-Wformat-truncation=] > 275 | snprintf(auxpair->dev, 64, "%s", > dev->filename); > | ^~ > In function ‘snprintf’, > inlined from ‘wispy24x_usb_device_scan’ at wispy_hw_24x.c:275:5: > /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:54:10: note: ‘__builtin_snprintf’ > output between 1 and 4097 bytes into a destination of size 64 > 54 | return __builtin___snprintf_chk (__s, __n, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > 55 | __glibc_objsize (__s), __fmt, > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > 56 | __va_arg_pack ()); > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > gcc -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -D_DEBUG -I./ -g -O2 > -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. > -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat > -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -c spectool_curses.c -o > spectool_curses.o > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > make[1]: *** [Makefile:97: ubertooth_hw_u1.o] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/03/13/spectools_201601r1-3_unstable.log All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240313;users=lu...@debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240313&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
