Source: pgdbf
Version: 0.6.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.

This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more information, see
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2024-03-13_-Werror.3Dimplicit-function-declaration

Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..   -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -g -O2 
> -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. 
> -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat 
> -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -c -o pgdbf.o pgdbf.c
> pgdbf.c: In function ‘main’:
> pgdbf.c:533:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘asprintf’; did you 
> mean ‘vsprintf’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   533 |             if(asprintf(&pgfields[fieldnum].formatstring, "%%.%dlf", 
> fields[fieldnum].decimals) < 0) {
>       |                ^~~~~~~~
>       |                vsprintf
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[3]: *** [Makefile:366: pgdbf.o] Error 1


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/03/13/pgdbf_0.6.2-1.1_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240313;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240313&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

Reply via email to