On 28/03/2024 17:26, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Hi Andreas,
There are loads of old bugs including rather severe ones at first
glance. The fact that the packaging is very dated is not the real
problem (Updating to dh could probably be done in in an , since it os
basically a single binary package.)
On 2024-03-28 Peter B wrote:
> On 27/03/2024 14:57, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> mpg321 is dead upstream
> I don't see that as a show stopper.
>> Please consider moving to another player, e.g. mpg123.
> I moved away from ffmpeg after c-evo-dh showed a puiparts fail
> stemming from libnettle8.
Hi Andreas,
On 27/03/2024 14:57, Andreas Metzler wrote:
mpg321 is dead upstream
I don't see that as a show stopper.
Please consider moving to another player, e.g. mpg123.
I moved away from ffmpeg after c-evo-dh showed a puiparts fail
stemming from libnettle8. c-evo-dh does not use any
Source: c-evo-dh
Version: 1.11-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: ametz...@bebt.de
User: ametz...@debian.org
Usertags: mpg321-removal
Hello,
this package depends on mpg321. mpg321 is dead upstream (last change
2012, about 12 years ago), it was initially created because of license
issues with
4 matches
Mail list logo
