Bug#1067946: dietlibc: Includes non-free Sun RPC

2024-05-12 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Bastian Germann dixit: >> Do you have a link? > > No. It is not a public address. Ah, yes, that is unfortunate. I used to be subscribed and have no idea why I’m not, but I re-subscribed (though have not yet seen any traffic in the last couple of days). >> What did upstream say? > > No upstream

Bug#1067946: dietlibc: Includes non-free Sun RPC

2024-05-12 Thread Bastian Germann
Am 04.05.24 um 03:33 schrieb Thorsten Glaser: Hi Bastian, I have already informed upstream about it. did you do that on a mailing list? I have reported to felix-dietl...@fefe.de. Do you have a link? No. It is not a public address. What did upstream say? No upstream response up to

Bug#1067946: dietlibc: Includes non-free Sun RPC

2024-05-03 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi Bastian, >I have already informed upstream about it. did you do that on a mailing list? Do you have a link? What did upstream say? Still unconvinced, //mirabilos -- If Harry Potter gets a splitting headache in his scar when he’s near Tom Riddle (aka Voldemort), does Tom get pain in the arse

Bug#1067946: dietlibc: Includes non-free Sun RPC

2024-03-29 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Bastian Germann dixit: >dietlibc includes the sunrpc code from old glibc versions, which is >demonstrated to be non-free in #181493. The text in dietlibc reads thusly though: Users * may copy or modify Sun RPC without charge,

Bug#1067946: dietlibc: Includes non-free Sun RPC

2024-03-29 Thread Bastian Germann
Source: dietlibc Version: 0.10-1 Severity: serious dietlibc includes the sunrpc code from old glibc versions, which is demonstrated to be non-free in #181493. I have already informed upstream about it. Please replace that code with the current glibc sunrpc, which was relicensed to a BSD