[ Steve added, for the symbol list question ]
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 09:44:43PM +0300, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 08:53PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 07:23:29PM +0300, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> > > I believe it's not. haskell-hourglass used to work on
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 08:53PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 07:23:29PM +0300, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> > I believe it's not. haskell-hourglass used to work on arm{el,hf} just
> > before the time64 transition.
>
> before this transition x32 was the only 32bit architecture with
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 07:23:29PM +0300, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
Hi Ilias,
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 12:56PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > FTR, in haskell-hourglass this is #1001686 which already failed on x32
> > for this reason.
>
> I believe it's not. haskell-hourglass used to work
Hi Adrian,
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 12:56PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> FTR, in haskell-hourglass this is #1001686 which already failed on x32
> for this reason.
I believe it's not. haskell-hourglass used to work on arm{el,hf} just
before the time64 transition.
> My reading of the code is that this
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 05:18:06PM +0300, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> Package: ghc
> Version: 9.4.7-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> I recently uploaded a new version of GHC to unstable, in order to fix
> #1068179. As a result, GHC got rebuilt taking into account
Package: ghc
Version: 9.4.7-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I recently uploaded a new version of GHC to unstable, in order to fix
#1068179. As a result, GHC got rebuilt taking into account the new size
for time_t on arm{el,hf}. This is evident from the build logs, where
6 matches
Mail list logo
