On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 10:42:42AM -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> Yes, we will need to add that in a bookworm stable update. I expect
> we'll want a separate spu bug to track that, correct?
Yes please.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer
On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 11:26:55AM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
> > index 9bd33d11..bc3b921c 100644
> > --- a/debian/changelog
> > +++ b/debian/changelog
> > @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
> > +cloud-init-22.4.2 (22.4.2-2~bpo11+1) bullseye-security;
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 11:05:50AM -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
>
> diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
> index 9bd33d11..bc3b921c 100644
> --- a/debian/changelog
> +++ b/debian/changelog
> @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
> +cloud-init-22.4.2 (22.4.2-2~bpo11+1)
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 09:14:14PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > There are pros and cons to each option. Given bullseye's age and
> > cloud-init's blast radius (a regression could potentially disrupt the
> > provisioning process of cloud VMs, which is
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:21:01AM -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> There are pros and cons to each option. Given bullseye's age and
> cloud-init's blast radius (a regression could potentially disrupt the
> provisioning process of cloud VMs, which is particularly
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: cloud-i...@packages.debian.org, t...@security.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:cloud-init
Hi folks. This isn't a straightforward stable proposed-updates
6 matches
Mail list logo
