Hi,
looks good, applies cleanly & works, but let me be picky and
ask for some more changes anyhow:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:05:52PM +, James Clarke wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 02:31:02PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> e.g. APT::FTPArchive::Release::Origin. The supported
>
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 02:31:02PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (doh… I thought I had sent this mail 7 days ago…)
Heh, no problem, it happens!
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 03:48:11PM +0100, James Clarke wrote:
> > diff --git a/ftparchive/writer.cc b/ftparchive/writer.cc index
> >
Hi,
(doh… I thought I had sent this mail 7 days ago…)
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 03:48:11PM +0100, James Clarke wrote:
> unless priorities are manually configured locally. The attached patch
> should fix this (compiled but not tested).
Thanks for the patch, but… (continued inline).
> Commit
Hi,
Currently mini-dak uses apt-ftparchive and specifies
-o APT::FTPArchive::Release::NotAutomatic=yes for experimental, but this
has no effect, so any available experimental packages get pulled in
unless priorities are manually configured locally. The attached patch
should fix this (compiled but
2010/3/20 Trent W. Buck trentb...@gmail.com:
martin f krafft wrote:
Please add [NotAutomatic: yes] functionality to apt-ftparchive by
adding a configuration option to its configuration stanza.
This feature is still absent, and still desirable (to me, at least).
Are the maintainers waiting
David Kalnischkies wrote:
Are the maintainers waiting for a patch to be submitted?
[...] apt-ftparchive doesn't have a maintainer currently who takes
care of features and/or bugs and is therefore in (very) low
maintenance mode [...]
OK, I didn't realize.
[...] if you have a patch and/or
martin f krafft wrote:
Please add [NotAutomatic: yes] functionality to apt-ftparchive by
adding a configuration option to its configuration stanza.
This feature is still absent, and still desirable (to me, at least).
Are the maintainers waiting for a patch to be submitted?
--
To
7 matches
Mail list logo