Bug#287371: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#287371: xsltproc: Probable memory leak (when using document()?)

2022-04-24 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2022-02-19 18:28:00 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > I'll test again (I've been using a fake DTD for the past 15 years). This has just happened. The consequence is that several unrelated processes were killed by the OOM killer, including daemons! [...] Apr 25 02:44:53 zira systemd[6589]:

Bug#287371: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#287371: xsltproc: Probable memory leak (when using document()?)

2022-02-19 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2022-02-19 18:01:52 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 01:08:33PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > This is no different than CVE-2013-0338 and CVE-2013-0339[*]. The > > point is that from a small document, one can exhaust the memory > > of the machine. CVE-2013-0338 and

Bug#287371: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#287371: xsltproc: Probable memory leak (when using document()?)

2022-02-19 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 01:08:33PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > This is no different than CVE-2013-0338 and CVE-2013-0339[*]. The > point is that from a small document, one can exhaust the memory > of the machine. CVE-2013-0338 and CVE-2013-0339 are about entity > expansion, but there are the

Bug#287371: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#287371: xsltproc: Probable memory leak (when using document()?)

2005-01-10 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2004-12-31 14:15:42 +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 02:40:54AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2004-12-30 14:05:06 +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: Can you try with xsltproc from the experimental distribution? I know several memleaks have been fixed