[re-adding bugreport to list of recipients]
On 12-01-31 at 10:17pm, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Andreas, hi Jonas, hi all,
thanks for the reply!!!
On Fr 27 Jan 2012 11:44:02 CET Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 04:27:40PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
[...]
[...]
I also
On Donnerstag, 26. Januar 2012, Mike Gabriel wrote:
To address #311188 the latest approach that has been discussed is
enrolling the maintainers of all affected packages (and that can be
many) to add blend-customized debconf values to their packages so that
a clean preseeding of the package is
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 04:27:40PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 12-01-26 at 12:24pm, Mike Gabriel wrote:
I am talking about each single Debian package. Not the whole system.
And every package in this model can be in non-blended mode or in blend
mode for _one_ blend.
Thanks for the
Hi all,
after having worked with the Debian Edu team for a couple of months
now I would like to make a proposal on how to address configuration
file manipulation within Debian blends.
For further reading on configuration file manipulation and Debian
policy violation refer to bug #311188
Hi Mike,
On 12-01-26 at 11:13am, Mike Gabriel wrote:
To address #311188 the latest approach that has been discussed is
enrolling the maintainers of all affected packages (and that can be
many) to add blend-customized debconf values to their packages so that
a clean preseeding of the
Hi Jonas, hi all,
On Do 26 Jan 2012 11:58:55 CET Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
So, my opinion is that without implementing the blending mechanism
within Debian policy itself (and that is also: within dpkg itself),
we may possibly stall here for longer.
It is the other way around: Debian Policy
Hi,
NB! Please do not cc me - I am subscribed to both d-blends@ and the
bugreport.
More info at http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
On 12-01-26 at 12:24pm, Mike Gabriel wrote:
I am talking about each single Debian package. Not the whole system.
And every package in this model
7 matches
Mail list logo
