On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 09:22:11PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
The distinction is important, because libraries atime is unreliable
due to the use of ldconfig, so libraries are marked NOFILES, but we still
want to know about libraries usage, so the use of dependencies allow to
make recently
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 11:45:45AM -0500, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 09:22:11PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
The distinction is important, because libraries atime is unreliable
due to the use of ldconfig, so libraries are marked NOFILES, but we still
want to
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 02:30:04PM -0500, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 07:59:44PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
One clarification, though: the popularity-contest report does not
contain any package version info, so I'm curious what data the server
uses when
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 09:47:31PM -0500, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
I've been noticing the popularity-contest package/project mentioned
frequently on Debian mailing lists and similar places, and often those
messages mention votes for this or that package.
However, when I installed the
Package: popularity-contest
Version: 1.28
Severity: wishlist
I've been noticing the popularity-contest package/project mentioned
frequently on Debian mailing lists and similar places, and often those
messages mention votes for this or that package.
However, when I installed the package myself
5 matches
Mail list logo
