Russ Allbery wrote:
Josh Triplett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given that for 99.9% of packages it would constitute a bug to Depends:
x-window-system-core, you could add it and just let metapackages add
lintian overrides. That would catch the showeq case. On the other
hand, that seems highly
Josh Triplett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
debtags might help here:
Package: x-window-system
[...]
Tag: interface::x11, role::aux:metapackage, special::meta,
x11::terminal, x11::window-manager, x11::xserver
Package: x-window-system-core
[...]
Tag: interface::x11, role::aux:metapackage,
Josh Triplett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given that for 99.9% of packages it would constitute a bug to Depends:
x-window-system-core, you could add it and just let metapackages add
lintian overrides. That would catch the showeq case. On the other
hand, that seems highly suboptimal. In the
Hi Josh,
I was looking at your lintian patch in #347169 with an eye to applying it,
but as near as I can tell, it's now unnecessary. Since you sent the
patch, xlibs-dev has been included in obsolete packages, so that part is
already done. The remaining section diagnoses dependencies on
Russ Allbery wrote:
I was looking at your lintian patch in #347169 with an eye to applying it,
but as near as I can tell, it's now unnecessary. Since you sent the
patch, xlibs-dev has been included in obsolete packages, so that part is
already done. The remaining section diagnoses
Josh Triplett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It looks like at least one package (showeq) depends on
x-window-system-core (also not for use in Depends),
The description of x-window-system-core explicitly says it's for use in
Depends, actually. It does say that it's for use in Depends for
Russ Allbery wrote:
Josh Triplett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It looks like at least one package (showeq) depends on
x-window-system-core (also not for use in Depends),
The description of x-window-system-core explicitly says it's for use in
Depends, actually. It does say that it's for use in
7 matches
Mail list logo
