Ross Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 09:40:52PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Ross Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings:
`etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex latex jadetex.ini' failed
`pdfetex -ini
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
`pdfetex -ini -jobname=pdfjadetex -progname=pdfjadetex pdflatex
pdfjadetex.ini' failed
It's the same problem already discussed earlier: fmtutil generates the
formats in a temporary directory, but the ones in /var/lib/texmf are
still in the
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
`etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex latex jadetex.ini' failed
`pdfetex -ini -jobname=pdfjadetex -progname=pdfjadetex pdflatex
pdfjadetex.ini' failed
I don't even remember in which bug we discussed it (probably it was in
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Norbert Preining wrote:
I don't even remember in which bug we discussed it (probably it was in
connection with jadetex), but does anybody remember any serious
arguments against the quick-and-dirty solution of removing the old
formats in /var/lib/texmf/web2c?
Another
Ross Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings:
`etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex latex jadetex.ini' failed
`pdfetex -ini -jobname=pdfjadetex -progname=pdfjadetex pdflatex
pdfjadetex.ini' failed
fmtutil failed. Output has been
Ross Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any info on whether my tetex system is safe to use, and work-arounds
if it is not, would be great. Thanks.
I'm pretty sure that everything but jadetex is fine. But safe it is,
anyway - it will never destroy any input files, will it?
More to the problem
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 09:40:52PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Ross Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings:
`etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex latex jadetex.ini' failed
`pdfetex -ini -jobname=pdfjadetex -progname=pdfjadetex
7 matches
Mail list logo
